vicr3000
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎28-02-2015 06:59 PM


The anoniminity of twitter etc shows how gutless these people are.



0 Helpful

j*oono
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎28-02-2015 07:00 PM

Pretty funny though wasn't it 😄  Although as Glee said, it was copycat, not just copyright.

Joono
0 Helpful

vicr3000
Community Member
In response to j*oono

on ‎28-02-2015 07:01 PM


So what.


0 Helpful

j*oono
Community Member
In response to vicr3000

on ‎28-02-2015 07:05 PM

It's what you call thread drift I believe Vic.  Most forums allow a bit of thread drift.

Joono
0 Helpful

gleee58
Community Member
In response to j*oono

on ‎28-02-2015 08:33 PM

@j*oono wrote:

Anyway, like I said.

 

Mike Baird had his youtube video taken down due to copyright infringement.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-27/nsw-premier-mike-baird-twitter-youtube-copyright/6268260?secti...

 

 

The other consideration is that it was a political campaign message.  That's a separate copyright issue than the standard usage on youtube videos.

0 Helpful

idlewhile
Community Member
In response to j*oono

on ‎01-03-2015 07:11 AM

@j*oono wrote:

It's what you call thread drift I believe Vic.  Most forums allow a bit of thread drift.

No it was off topic and designed to distract.

0 Helpful

polksaladallie
Community Member
In response to gleee58

on ‎01-03-2015 08:40 AM

Glee, I thought for a split second you were being hit on in post 50, last comment.    Smiley Surprised      I'm sure you could do better. 

i-need-a-martini
Community Member

on ‎01-03-2015 08:49 AM

So where do I report the fact that our local Liberal candidate has nailed his ugly face to telegraph poles throughout our local shopping village and opposite the railway station? 

 

(Seriously, what a ridiculous thread. As if Labor and Greens are the only culprits. And what the heck has this to even do with the unions?? Talk about paranoid Liberals using any means they can regardless of how stupid it makes them look in order to smear the opposition in a lead up to an election.)

i-need-a-martini
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎01-03-2015 08:53 AM

@idlewhile wrote:

The "your rights at work" posters, there's still some on poles and that was in 2007.

 

Frankly the lies the unions are spreading like "privatisation of public  hospitals"  "Tafe" and all "electricty providers"? 

 

Complete and utter lies.

Lies? So you haven't been following the NSW election campaign then and seen what Baird is proposing? 

 

Is the article below a lie:

 

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/support-falling-for-mike-bairds-electricity-privatisation-plan-despite-20-...

 

And a reminder to how the Qld government ended up with these 'lies'...

0 Helpful

i-need-a-martini
Community Member
In response to idlewhile

on ‎01-03-2015 09:03 AM

@idlewhile wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:
Hopefully, that post won't be there for long :). I will leave you all to your name calling
Try and have a pleasant day, won't you

Push the report button and leave...a left thing is it? Your'e the one who started with the overalls slur of Lib women.

Um no.

 

In response to Debras comments about the Liberal candidate removing Labor posters in her electorate, Vic suggested in post 20 that anyone can put up or take down anything from poles if they are wearing overalls. Debra rightly pointed out that this woman was not wearing overalls. (Actually she was wearing a skirt and high heels in the footage I saw).

 

So how is this sexist and how is it that Debras posts are an issue?

 

You should stick to the facts idelwhite and try not to read things between the lines (or IN the lines) that are simply not there.