yeah see ya 

LOL

---

@idlewhile wrote:

That's why you have changed your tune re Murdoch papers. Credible is still on holiday.

---

So you are saying Murdoch papers aren't credible now?? . If I post something from The Austrailan which is a view you don't agree with, then that paper is  no longer credible because it doesn't match your view?

You can't pick and choose whether The Australian is credible or not, depending on which article is quoted.

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

, all of you are on here.

---

There is no who is allowed and who isn't in ANY thread.  

am3

You must really love us, you spend more time here than on your thread LOL

I know we are a popular lot but really, don't feel then need to "hang on" if you don't want to.

Oh, you have to donate $20 to the IPA every time you post on here

they only used to be gospel truth Am, especially when they printed articles about Gillard or Rudd 

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/tony-abbott-i-think-hes-a- t i t -miriam-margolyes-...

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

 

am3

 

You must really love us, you spend more time here than on your thread LOL

 

I know we are a popular lot but really, don't feel then need to "hang on" if you don't want to.

 

 

 

Oh, you have to donate $20 to the IPA every time you post on here

---

Rant on all you like (as in the majority of your posts are just chatter, nothing to do with Abbott) , you have no influence on where people post.

---

@debra9275 wrote:

they only used to be gospel truth Am, especially when they printed articles about Gillard or Rudd 

---

So true.....