---

@am*3 wrote:

---

@idlewhile wrote:

That's why you have changed your tune re Murdoch papers. Credible is still on holiday.

---

So you are saying Murdoch papers aren't credible now?? . If I post something from The Austrailan which is a view you don't agree with, then that paper is  no longer credible because it doesn't match your view?

 

You can't pick and choose whether The Australian is credible or not, depending on which article is quoted.

 

 

---

Don't verbal me. You and your adherents have, for years, scoffed and derided all Murdoch press.  To  say different is laughable, credibility has been suspended every time you post.

so are you scoffing them now? or do you still see them as your most credible source??

Cartoon source: The Australian

Tony & Malcolm

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

You miss the point.

The fact you (lot) have to come over here makes us all smile
and proves the point and our objective.

---

oh come on Vic, anyone would think you've never posted in the diary thread, and we all know you've been one of the main contributors over there LOL

---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@am*3 wrote:

---

@idlewhile wrote:

That's why you have changed your tune re Murdoch papers. Credible is still on holiday.

---

So you are saying Murdoch papers aren't credible now?? . If I post something from The Austrailan which is a view you don't agree with, then that paper is  no longer credible because it doesn't match your view?

 

You can't pick and choose whether The Australian is credible or not, depending on which article is quoted.

 

 

---

Don't verbal me. You and your adherents have, for years, scoffed and derided all Murdoch press.  To  say different is laughable, credibility has been suspended every time you post.

---

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

---

@vicr3000 wrote:

 

I didn't say closed down. I said canned.

 

As in criticised.

 

 

I would close down the ABC, or severely cut it's budget, that's about the only one.

I wouldn't be surprised what skeletons are hidden in the closet, if it's anything like the BBC,

they have covered up heaps of insidous things like lefties have been shown to do.

 

 

 

---

---

@idlewhile wrote:

---

@am*3 wrote:

---

@idlewhile wrote:

That's why you have changed your tune re Murdoch papers. Credible is still on holiday.

---

So you are saying Murdoch papers aren't credible now?? . If I post something from The Austrailan which is a view you don't agree with, then that paper is  no longer credible because it doesn't match your view?

 

You can't pick and choose whether The Australian is credible or not, depending on which article is quoted.

 

 

---

Don't verbal me. You and your adherents have, for years, scoffed and derided all Murdoch press.  To  say different is laughable, credibility has been suspended every time you post.

---

Your opinion only. I disagre with it. Some people just can't handle anti-Abbott views no matter what MAINSTREAM MEDIA outlet they are published in.

Credibility 0 - for anyone who complains about  anti-Abbott articles from The Australian.

More up Bill Shorten's type of school. Except I think he was Xavier !