Like Amber 🙂

 

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.


@lionrose.7 wrote:

You say it so much better then me hahah .


Nah, you said it great 🙂

 

there are lots of genes involved though...eyes like many genetic traits are complex things.

 

 

 

 I am a mutant, Poddy.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Buttercup: You mock my pain! Man in Black: Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.

I think that nature needs to be more selective. Wars are more effective when it comes to over population  than a person's sexuality. As is disease.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

Thats interesting Amber, both my daughter and her hubby have brown hair and eyes, their daughter has very bright blue eyes and blonde hair.

As for the OP's question, doesn't bother me either way, each to their own


@poddster wrote:

Icy I think Az has worked it out 🙂

 

Homosexuality is nature's secret weapon angains over population 🙂


Drought is nature's secret weapon against animal overpopulation in some areas.

 

 

 


@bluecat*dancing wrote:

I think that nature needs to be more selective. Wars are more effective when it comes to over population  than a person's sexuality. As is disease.

 

 

lets not forget religion..

 

 

Nature has tried disease and war

Humans have curtailed natures solution of disease and to a certain aspect war too. So nature came up with homosexuals 🙂

They are a protected species

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.


@azureline** wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

@bluecat*dancing wrote:

Hetero is the norm and is as natural as homosexuality.

 

 


No. Hetero is the norm and is natural. Homosexuality may be preferable to some, but it is not natural.


Is that your opinion or do you have some scientific/genetic evidence?


My opinion is immaterial in this matter. How much scientific genetic evidence do you need? How many homosexual couples can produce a child naturally without help from someone from the oopposite sex?

 

 


@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:

 

 

 


@bluecat*dancing wrote:

I think that nature needs to be more selective. Wars are more effective when it comes to over population  than a person's sexuality. As is disease.

 

 

lets not forget religion..

 


I did forget drugs


@poddster wrote:

Icy I think Az has worked it out 🙂

 

Homosexuality is nature's secret weapon angains over population 🙂


oh right lol Smiley Wink