@gleee58 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Why is the sisterhood not baying for his blood over his gang-banging comments?
Which "sisterhood" are you referring to, Icy?
The sisterhood that screams "misogynist" over something like a wink from the PM when a senior sex worker calls in on a listener's line. Or when the the PM refers to "houswives doing their ironing".
Yet think it's quite OK for someone like Mallah to get TV time after his foul tweets earlier this year calling 2 senior female journos "whores" and that they should be gang-raped
Is it a "sisterhood" to which you belong?
I don't belong to any sisterhood thank you. I'm a free agent
Mallah fitted in quite well with the one who said Gillard should have her throat slit and the one who said she should be kicked to death and you're right, none of them should have been on QandA after their comments encouraging violence against women.
unbelievable 
fitted in quite well?
i didnt think there would be anyone trying
to justify his right to be heard 
especially a woman
unbelievable 
fitted in quite well?
i didnt think there would be anyone trying
to justify his right to be heard 
especially a woman
You obviously missd this bit: none of them should have been on QandA after their comments encouraging violence against women
That doesn't sound to me like justifying any of them.
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@gleee58 wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Why is the sisterhood not baying for his blood over his gang-banging comments?
Which "sisterhood" are you referring to, Icy?
The sisterhood that screams "misogynist" over something like a wink from the PM when a senior sex worker calls in on a listener's line. Or when the the PM refers to "houswives doing their ironing".
Yet think it's quite OK for someone like Mallah to get TV time after his foul tweets earlier this year calling 2 senior female journos "whores" and that they should be gang-raped
Is it a "sisterhood" to which you belong?
I don't belong to any sisterhood thank you. I'm a free agent
Mallah fitted in quite well with the one who said Gillard should have her throat slit and the one who said she should be kicked to death and you're right, none of them should have been on QandA after their comments encouraging violence against women.
unbelievable
fitted in quite well?
i didnt think there would be anyone trying
to justify his right to be heard
especially a woman
Who is justifying his right to be heard? All I said is he fitted in well with a couple of panel members, as they each have been known to speak of violence towards women. In case you missed it, I highlighted the bit you seem to have missed.
you answered with:
Mallah fitted in quite well with the one who said Gillard should have her throat slit and the one who said she should be kicked to death and you're right, none of them should have been on QandA after their comments encouraging violence against women.
attempting to detract attention from mallah/
justifying him being on the show -
it is how i see it.
That's not detracting attention at all it's just pointing out the obvious. You can't lambast one person for their comments and demand they be answerable to them while letting off 2 other people who made remarks that were just as offensive. Common sense should prevail. All three of them made disgusting comments against women and therefore all three of them should be answerable for them.
