😄


@monman12 wrote:

"Im so relieved that we have a responsible government who are dealing with “ climate change ” that will not beggar our country and destroy jobs."

 

Both parties give the impression that GHG emissions are nothing more than a political football game played by  3rd division  teams before a poorly  informed electorate.

 

If Australia doubled or halved its annual carbon emissions,  it would make no perceptible difference to atmospheric CO2 concentration.

The original Kyoto (1997) and subsequent climate talk-fests have had no effect on the inexorable  rise in atmospheric CO2 , and in fact the annual variation is accelerating.

 

Mauna Loa CO2

Recent Monthly Average Mauna Loa CO2

July 2015:     401.30 ppm
July 2014:     399.00 ppm
 
siggy dogs cats smaller.jpg

Mauna Loa (/ˌmɔːnə ˈl.ə/ or /ˌmnə ˈl.ə/; Hawaiian: [ˈmɔunə ˈlowə]; English: Long Mountain[3]) is one of five volcanoes that form the Island of Hawaii in the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi in the Pacific Ocean. The largest subaerial volcano in both mass and volume, Mauna Loa has historically been considered the largest volcano on Earth. It is an active shield volcano with relatively shallow slopes, with a volume estimated at approximately 18,000 cubic miles (75,000 km3),[4] although its peak is about 120 feet (37 m) lower than that of its neighbor, Mauna Kea. Lava eruptions from Mauna Loa are silica-poor and very fluid, and they tend to be non-explosive.

 

 I suppose increased levels of CO 2 could be expected from an active volcano.

Our climate is changing; it's getting warmer; globally.

 

Our planet is warming up and this warming changes the climate.

 

There's no hoax involved unless it's the one perpetrated by people who have an agenda convincing us that it just isn't so.

 

We'd all love to live in a utopian world where no one starves and where everyone has enough money and where there are no religious loonies attacking everyone else, religiously and where no one pollutes our environment.

 

But it just isn't so. Our reality is not like that.

 

All that aside; it is just foolishness to continue to spew any pollutant in whatever level or degree into the environment. That sort of behaviour does no one good in the long term even though some people might stand to benefit from it in the short term.

 

When people act in certain way, it's always instructive to examine the motives for their actions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(for instance; John archives most, if not all of the posts we make here. What's his motive?)

 

 


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/climate-change-july-was-the-hottest-month-re...

(giggle)

Well I'm not giggling. I'm in hysterics. What's more I think I've just cracked a rib laughing at that stupid editorial from those idiot Boffins. Up to now we haven't had any Summer (UK) at all. In fact it's been more like Winter, with people muffled up in scarves and anoraks.

 

And now to round off August, this:

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uk-weather-thunder-lightning-forecast-6245546

I remember living in the UK in the late 1960's, and if it happened that we had a spell of bad weather during June and July, we just kissed our summer goodbye and waited 'till next year.

 

But in those days, the weather wasn't quite as severe as it is now. So, what has changed?

 

Could it be that between then and now, our collective industries have been spewing out an unconscionable amount of pollutants into the atmosphere?

 

Cause and effect. Increasing degrees of pollutants in my enviroment give me cause to reflect that my environment is becoming less and less friendly to me, my family and the animals which share our planet with us.

 

 

moonflyte
Community Member

"Even the rain that falls will not fill up our dams and rivers"  remember that prediction from Flannery?.

 

The Warragamba dam will spill today and this is the 3rd time it has since Flanell made his prediction. After his hysterical prediction the Labor parties in nearly every state hysterically ran out and built de sal plants that cost $billions. 

 

We are still paying for these plants, millions to mothball them, millions wasted every day and Labor have the gall to expect to be voted back in?

Flannery's not a climate scientist.He's a palaeontologist.He does however have a background in and an understanding ofscience.Something Bolt etc do not.

Who mentioned Bolt?