No, not just in my opinion.

 

The doco is scheduled for cinema release in early September, I believe.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

 

 


secondhand-wonderland wrote: 

At what age do you think it's necessary? Year 8 or 9 imo. Not primary school...


 

Some schools start sex ed classes in primary school..puberty is beginning younger and younger..

At my sons primary school, it was taught as part of health and sport..more holistic and less specific for the age group to understand.

There was also a section about inappropriate touching and stranger danger, including the internet.

Parents were invited to attend..

 

Re the topic- I wondered about the 'compulsory' bit of watching the movie, and think thats been taken out of context- most schools will make these movies/ plays/ performances/ school exhibitions etc compulsory during school time so that parents know that their child is expected to attend.

I would be surprised if the option to opt out was not also given.

 

 

 

These are teenagers- this is happening in their world


@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:

Yes, I agree bluecat* and what is also outrageous are the comments re sex education.. do people here seriously think that sex ed is not taught in religious schools? 

Well, you might need to wake up, or take your rose coloured glasses off, or actually meet some young people..sex ed has been offered in schools for years, and its not just about contraception- (or as someone else mentioned, promiscuity) its a more holistic teaching of health and responsibility, within a peer framework. These discussions need to happen at ages where students are able to understand the information, and what better place than school? 

 

This generation has access to sex and all the implications of it readily- more than any previous generations, and they dont need to leave home to access it. Any connection to the internet either via phones or computers allow that. 

 

 


At what age do you think it's necessary? Year 8 or 9 imo. Not primary school...


Ideally, imo, sex education should start when children ask, usually when they are pre school age.

My children had sex ed in school, aged about 10, as I recall, however they had already been educated at home. Not sure what happens now.

What you rather the school had done? Purple Day is part of the curriculum.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

Those who are most vocal about tolerance need to start practising it themselves, or maybe they are confused with the meaning of the word. Tolerance doesn't mean forcing your view on someone else and insisting they accept it or explain themselves, nor does it mean they cant voice their own opinion without being called names or ostracised.
 
Maybe there were complaints to the school or maybe people were too scared to complain because those expecting tolerance don't really seem to be able to give it in return. The choice to not view the film is a personal one and not something people shouldn't be scared to make in case of repercussions.
 
You can still be tolerant of other peoples views/opinions/lifestyle/religion without agreeing with them. But its supposed to work both ways.
 
I think the film probably has a place in the curriculum, in social studies or humanities for example. It would probably be a great subject for students to study and put forward points of view, unfortunately I think only one point of view would be acceptable though.
 
 
 
 
 
 
tolerance
ˈtɒl(ə)r(ə)ns/
noun
noun: tolerance; plural noun: tolerances
  1. 1.
    the ability or willingness to tolerate the existence of opinions or behaviour that one dislikes or disagrees with.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 photo screen-1-1-1-1.jpg


@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

@youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit wrote:

Yes, I agree bluecat* and what is also outrageous are the comments re sex education.. do people here seriously think that sex ed is not taught in religious schools? 

Well, you might need to wake up, or take your rose coloured glasses off, or actually meet some young people..sex ed has been offered in schools for years, and its not just about contraception- (or as someone else mentioned, promiscuity) its a more holistic teaching of health and responsibility, within a peer framework. These discussions need to happen at ages where students are able to understand the information, and what better place than school? 

 

This generation has access to sex and all the implications of it readily- more than any previous generations, and they dont need to leave home to access it. Any connection to the internet either via phones or computers allow that. 

 

 


At what age do you think it's necessary? Year 8 or 9 imo. Not primary school...


BGHS, is a high school.

Mine were around the same age, Az, perhaps a year younger.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins


@bluecat*stopsdancing wrote:

No, not just in my opinion.

 

The doco is scheduled for cinema release in early September, I believe.


maybe the school could organise a cinema night.


@eeebatt wrote:

Regretfully, azureline**, sex education does not prevent promiscuity.


It doesnt promote it either.

My grandsons, 6 and 8 yo, have friends with 2 mums and another with 2 dads, they see nothing odd or different about it except for the ones with 2 mums, "how can they come out of 2 mums tummies?"