@amber-eyed-girl wrote:

Joz, I kudos you for the cat picture because I have a photo of me in a wig that is not dissimilar. 

 

Couldn't help it.

 

 


gee, i've neglected this place haven't i? i miss some of you guys, but when it comes to that poster [humourless] i'm reminded why i post elsewhere


Signatures suck.


@joz*garage wrote:

@amber-eyed-girl wrote:

Joz, I kudos you for the cat picture because I have a photo of me in a wig that is not dissimilar. 

 

Couldn't help it.

 

 


gee, i've neglected this place haven't i? i miss some of you guys, but when it comes to that poster [humourless] i'm reminded why i post elsewhere


Never mind about "humourless". Just post youself. You're opinion is valid as anyone else's


@icyfroth wrote:

@j*oono wrote:

No. It's to do with how it might help students to explore the subject.


so students should explore the subject of homosexual relationship? why?


YES Man Happy

Sooooooooo..........  they aren't forming the negative one sided opinions of their peers.


 

********* *********** *********** ************ ************ *********** ***********
Be Kind To Nurses....
They Stop The Doctors From Killing You.


@janeababe wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

@j*oono wrote:

No. It's to do with how it might help students to explore the subject.


so students should explore the subject of homosexual relationship? why?


YES Man Happy

Sooooooooo..........  they aren't forming the negative one sided opinions of their peers.


 


How would they form a negative opinion if they didn't watch it? Homosexuality is widely accepted these days. Doesn't mean we have to teach it to schoolkids.

Homosexuality is widely accepted these days. Doesn't mean we have to teach it to schoolkids.

 

What are you referring to by 'it'? Homosexuality or acceptance?

 


@justpolls wrote:

Homosexuality is widely accepted these days. Doesn't mean we have to teach it to schoolkids.

 

What are you referring to by 'it'? Homosexuality or acceptance?

 

both

moonflyte
Community Member

It seems that all the morals and tenets we  adhered to in a civilised society are under attack from leftist socialists opinion makers and twitter ranters.

 

Teaching children about homosexuality is just another one of the bricks of  society taken down.

 

What a person does and their sexual predilections should be private. Heterosexuals do not advertise their sexual preferences or acts, why? because it is the normal progression of life, homosexuality is not, it is sometimes a lifestyle choice and sometimes a psychological bent, it is not the norm. 

 

I have no problem with it but I don't want it taught to my children, young minds are precious and family units are normally Mother and Father and the role models for life's journey.

Just a thought...

 

There is a need to teach kids about homosexuality but perhaps it would be better received by the more "conservative" families if it was offered during sexual education classes.  It doesn't need to become part of a schools "culture" to fly gay pride flags or screen movies like this to the whole school community.  Why is there such a need these days to highlight sexual orientation all the time.  In the bigger picture, most kids, dont even care.  But in sex ed classes it can be shown in context beside a film about regualr birth perhaps.   

Teachers should be concentrating on teaching literacy and numeracy skills, geography, history, the arts, PE including basic sex education, science, social science.

 

So many young ppl leave school these days barely able to read or write.