- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:08 AM
Damage control is unconvincing. sprung.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:10 AM
a lot of things don't add up about it IMO LL.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:14 AM
a lot of things don't add up about it IMO LL.
no , they don't. the libs always try and weasel out of things with the help of the usual hack journo's and haties 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:17 AM
I have a daughter voting for the first time this year, she's taking everything in lol
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:22 AM
no , they don't. the libs always try and weasel out of things with the help of the usual hack journo's and haties 🙂
It didn't add up when Gillard's office boy took the flack for sending the indigenous protesters after Abbott!!!!! Who sends out a false report from the PM's office without the PM knowing?? and Gillard even said she didn't know the person woman it was sent too yet there are photos of her and the woman together...
I think the problem was with ALL media that went after the story with no due diligence. None went out and tracked the truth of the story... they all went out on the attack without going to the restaurant or trying to find out the original source.
It is a classic example of poor journalism.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:26 AM
unconvincing. 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:30 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:31 AM
Mr Brough says the menu was drawn up by a non-party member who thought it would be “humorous” and “didn’t mean any harm by it,” but is now “deeply apologetic”.’
If he knew details and that the non-party member was apologetic you would expect that he had had contact with this person and perhaps have known more...more of what was later written in the email.Sharing that info earlier would have , I'd imagine saved a lot of the fallout (including statements made by JG).
...yet if he knew he didn't share it
why ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:31 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 13-06-2013 10:34 AM
unconvincing. 🙂
Only to die hard labor luvvies and the bitter fanatical supporters of a failed PM and govt...
Keep on being unconvinced if that helps you get out of bed every day as September 14 is getting closer by the day and the Australian public will have their say and its not going to be pretty for Gillard and Labor.
