Anyway, I'm done talking politics - I think I have talked more politics in the last two days than I have in my lifetime.   Grateful, we all are:-)

You're more than welcome. I was happy to do my bit.:-)

It's mighty big of you to accept that you needed someone capable of looking at the situation in an unbiased objective manner and to assist in establishing a few FACTS, to separate them from hearsay and remind people to look for some PROOF.

It is just a shame that it has resulted in highlighting the inadequacies of our PM and that her supporters were left eating humble pie.

There are no facts, no proof and not likely to be any either in this saga..

Tony A is in my area today (Wollongong), a pity I had to work today, I could have tracked him down and asked him personally about that 'menu'. (They had a private fundraising party there last night too).     :^O   Wonder what was on the menu last night.

Yes, I bet there were no spare draft copies of any menu's lying around........

There are no facts, no proof and not likely to be any either in this saga..

THAT was the main FACT that I was trying to enlighten people about. Although a few FACTS have been established since then.

*shrugs*

Anyway, I'm done talking politics - I think I have talked more politics in the last two days than I have in my lifetime.

That is apparent by your knowledge of the subject.

The farce be with you 🙂 

It's mighty big of you to accept that you needed someone capable of looking at the situation in an unbiased objective manner and to assist in establishing a few FACTS, to separate them from hearsay and remind people to look for some PROOF.

A few words in your above ramble need highlighting.

Accept..... Um, no I don't. How do you know what I accept and what I don't

Capable... If you say so.

Unbiased objective manner..... :^O

My MIL used to refer to the lady who lived next door as a windbag but I never understood what she meant.................................until now. 

THAT was the main FACT that I was trying to enlighten people about. Although a few FACTS have been established since then.   *shrugs*

I don't think posters (the majority anyway) need you to enlighten them about that. We can work that out ourselves. This is a chat board, so what if a few get a bit carried away?

Why do some have to make a mountain out of a mole hill?

ROFLMAO - which thread were you reading?????

Just about every person in these threads has jumped on the guilty until proven innocent bandwagon and blindly believed what was written in the media without questioning it whilst ever what the media was saying made the PM look like a victim with NLP being the baddies LOLOLOL

anyway as I said I am done with it all. My work here is done, and at least Yoda had the decency to acknowledge the value of my objective contributions to the topic.

So it's sexist now to accurately describe someone is it? 

Or does this only apply if it's a woman? Would it be sexist if it were targeting Tony Abbot?

I feel the people who get offended by this are the same ones who are afraid to look down in case they notice their own breasts.