Re: Nightmare in Germany

bluecat*dancing · ‎13-10-2015

I can't read the entire article because it is subscription only. I do love a good satire with my coffee and, really, what you have posted couldn't be anything else but that.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

bluecat*dancing · ‎13-10-2015

Perhaps, Sharri Markson would have been better off using that as her link.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

Anonymous · ‎13-10-2015

@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:
Perhaps, Sharri Markson would have been better off using that as her link.

why? everyone knows there have been

threats. rememebr charlie hebdo?

As News Corp celebrated the company’s best journalism at its annual News Awards on Friday night, two of the journalists recognised, The Australian’s national security editor Paul Maley and cartoonist Bill Leak, both spoke about the threats to their safety.

debra9275 · ‎13-10-2015

no idea, here's the threat you've found

Victoria Police are investigating the threats, with a particular focus on this post: "theres no good left in u if none of u do something about the australian newspaper mocking our prophet peace be upon him. Dont be cowards (sic)."

is that the only one research turned up??

I thought from her headline there must've been something recent or numerous "threats"

debra9275 · ‎13-10-2015

@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:
Perhaps, Sharri Markson would have been better off using that as her link.

agree Blue- especially if that was the one she weas referring to

bluecat*dancing · ‎13-10-2015

Why? Because the article that she posted a link to ,said practically nothing about the journos being threatened, whereas, the one you posted a link to, did.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins

Anonymous · ‎13-10-2015

"theres no good left in u if none of u do something about the australian newspaper mocking our prophet peace be upon him. Dont be cowards (sic)."

is that the only one research turned up??

no but as the article said, the abc decided

not to post the other graphic content.

it would be inappropriate to post them on

ebay discussion board.

Anonymous · ‎13-10-2015

@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:
Why? Because the article that she posted a link to ,said practically nothing about the journos being threatened, whereas, the one you posted a link to, did.

it said there were threats to their safety

related to their reports covering isis.

is that not enough? did you want her

to list all the specific threats?

myoclon1cjerk · ‎13-10-2015

1.The Guardian wouldn't print that rubbish.
2.My antipathy towards Rupe is because of his biased,inflammatory,right wing reporting.Not much different from what Paul Joseph G would print if he were around.

debra9275 · ‎13-10-2015

I think they should've mentioned what specific threats they were talking about as they used this headline, Terrorists have threatened senior News Corp journalists

which made the article look as if it was about some recent threats which wasn't the case. Rather deceptive really