"Here you go;  maybe a Xmas pressie for likeminded people"

A bit like those anti- skimming cards. Some idiots will believe anything.


RFID Blocking
Those who sell RFID-blocking devices will try to scare you with stories, and they will probably also use a lot of technical information and specs to push their products. This information isn’t to say that RFID-products don’t work—most work just fine, but so does aluminum foil. All it takes to protect an RFID device is to wrap it in some aluminum foil.

Now, here’s the real kicker: Even if you want to invest in these products, you should ask yourself why you are doing it. In more than a decade, there has been no reported crime committed using an RFID-enabled device. Zero.

Experts have made the same claim—that RFID-blocking wallets and other accessories are unnecessary—for just as long as these items have been on the market. You can find hundreds of articles about RFID skimming, but not a single one of them has concrete evidence that this crime has ever happened!

If you're still worried that it could happen, the aluminum foil solution can put your mind at ease.


@*kazumi* wrote:

@4channel wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:
Sheeple be sheeple, 4chan. They feel safe in their herd and won't tolerate anyone with a different opinion.



Certainly seems that way icyfroth.  Smiley Frustrated

 

I saw this in a magazine some time back. Can't remember exactly how it went. Anyway, here goes.

 

Two sheep are in the paddock and one sheep says to the other, "Have you ever noticed that some of us go away and never come back"? The other one says something like, "It''s only your imagination.

"

Spoiler
Well, at least he didn't say, "I hope you're not suggesting the people who give us this nice grass to eat are up to something?"

Here you go;  maybe a Xmas pressie for likeminded people

 

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/5g-conspiracy-theorists-sell-350-usb-stick-to-fight-elec...


Thank you. I'll treasure it for one of those unwanted gifts we re-gift .


@peteepie wrote:

 

Please tell me where I can get 283 pounds for A$350.


Eat more chocolate!

LoL at calling people sheep because they don't agree with your views 😂😂


@debra9275 wrote:

LoL at calling people sheep because they don't agree with your views 😂😂


Nah... ppl don't  have to agree with my views...but they should involve themselves into reasonable discussion without insult...

They are... except for the ones calling others sheep


@4channel wrote:

@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
They should have fined every last one of them $1500.

I disagree. These people feel they have valid concerns and they got out there to make their voice known. I think for whatever risks, or percieved risks there were, this was the right thing to do. I doubt if many people would have infected each other.

 

The main thing is the concern about 5G. There haven't been any proper studies done on the effects of 5G. The effects of mobile phone radiation are known and documented but the media will never publish the true facts. On the official level, there's no conclusive proof. I've known a couple of people who have had cancer tumours in their head and inside their jaw on the same side they use their mobile phone. I've read about many others. Well, we never get to hear about it.

I saw a documentary about cell phone radiation some years ago. I can't remember if it was ABC or SBS. The towers were a major health concern as well.

 

OK, we have 2 issues here. One is progress (faster internet speed) and the other one is the health of the people. One of them is a money spinner. I wonder which one will be given priority to?

 

 

Spoiler

 

Now let's look at history.

 

 

 

 


 

According to this we have been using the frequencies for a while

 

It’s also important to note that the vast majority of frequencies being used for 5G have been used in the past for other things, including things like TV broadcasts and other data transmissions. Because of that, if 5G is unsafe, it means that we’ve been using “unsafe” frequencies for decades. Considering there hasn’t been an observed rise in cancer rates, it’s clear that these radio waves have no impact on human health.

 

https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/

 


@debra9275 wrote:

They are... except for the ones calling others sheep


donkey.

Nah, I prefer decent conversion to name calling 


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
"Here you go;  maybe a Xmas pressie for likeminded people"

A bit like those anti- skimming cards. Some idiots will believe anything.


RFID Blocking
Those who sell RFID-blocking devices will try to scare you with stories, and they will probably also use a lot of technical information and specs to push their products. This information isn’t to say that RFID-products don’t work—most work just fine, but so does aluminum foil. All it takes to protect an RFID device is to wrap it in some aluminum foil.

Now, here’s the real kicker: Even if you want to invest in these products, you should ask yourself why you are doing it. In more than a decade, there has been no reported crime committed using an RFID-enabled device. Zero.

Experts have made the same claim—that RFID-blocking wallets and other accessories are unnecessary—for just as long as these items have been on the market. You can find hundreds of articles about RFID skimming, but not a single one of them has concrete evidence that this crime has ever happened!

If you're still worried that it could happen, the aluminum foil solution can put your mind at ease.

you must go through a lot of aluminium foil...