Well, it's up to the congress now

---

@ashjoma wrote:

apparently Assad does not allow genetically modified crops in his country to preserve the health of his people, so why use chemical weapons on them.

 

but then there is this

 

“We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran” —

General Wesley Clark. Retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied 
Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia .

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya...

---

Yeah how about that! Yes we here in a democracy don't have that right to say if our crops should be
tampered with or not. I believe Russia is the same. Putin has gotten rid or stoppped at lot of GM tampering in Russia.

 

And to the second part, all I can say is that these people are beyond insane. The PNAC group aka The Neo-Con Crazies were fanatics.

How bored is that - LOL.

A 7 year old thread.

---

@rogevibe wrote:

I noticed not much air time now - and someone muffed north-west Syria , with another player running around there now 

---

How can we even begin to adress what has gone wrong there?  What was a productive country is now wrecked.  Greed is one of the big factors. Lybia was wrecked too.

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@poddsterwrote:

It seems like just another war that the US has to have to keep its economy buoyant and clear the streets of thugs by turning them into cannon fodder in another country.

 

Anyone ever wondered if perhaps the US may have had a hand in the use of chemical weapons as part of a false flag covert op? 

---

There's talk that the US is supporting the rebels by supplying arms and ammunition. Assad says that the rebels staged the attack in order to frame the government.

---

Well, that wouldn't be the first time it has happened.