- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:01 PM
But you are paying paypal for the service of transferring money, no matter what form it takes. You still have seller protection too, so why is it any different to paying fees for any other type of payment.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:10 PM
PP are not providing me anything different with an echeque than bank deposit does, and in fact it takes over twice as long.
They are providing the buyer the service with an echeque, so I think they should pay.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:19 PM
Doesn't paypal provide Seller Protection no matter what the funding source is?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:24 PM
Yes, but so does bank deposit hence me saying "PP are not providing me anything different with an echeque than bank deposit does"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:32 PM
Do I understand you correctly Kaz....the buyer can whistle for a refund if they do a bank transfer to pay you?
The seller and buyer are both covered if it is an e-cheque but only the seller is protected in the bank deposit scenario.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 04:46 PM
They are providing the buyer the service with an echeque, so I think they should pay.
But don't buyers essentially pay the fees regardless of funding source, anyway? As a business, I'm sure you factor the cost of using PayPal into your prices and so forth, so when buyer does pay with PayPal, you still get the X amount of profit you want...so wouldn't that just make it more of a case that you want them to be more aware that they're paying those fees if they use an echeque?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 29-08-2012 09:28 PM
You know what the fees are going to be before you list so if you don't like them don't use the site to sell.
It says in this book I am reading that by 2065 80% of women will be overweight.
See what a trendsetter I am?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 30-08-2012 04:14 AM
Do I understand you correctly Kaz....the buyer can whistle for a refund if they do a bank transfer to pay you?
The seller and buyer are both covered if it is an e-cheque but only the seller is protected in the bank deposit scenario.
No. You are not understanding me at all, but I also think that you knew that and are just being a little difficult for the sake of it.
My customers are covered for missing parcels regardless of the payment method because I am an honest, reliable seller.
If you read what I have actually written you will see that I have said is that the service I am receiving (ie paying for) from PP is no different from what I get from my bank.
This thread was about fees. I think the ebay fees are fair. If I didnt I wouldn't use the service. I would like to have the same choice when it comes to accpeting , or not, echeques, but I can't.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 30-08-2012 04:20 AM
But don't buyers essentially pay the fees regardless of funding source, anyway? As a business, I'm sure you factor the cost of using PayPal into your prices and so forth, so when buyer does pay with PayPal, you still get the X amount of profit you want...so wouldn't that just make it more of a case that you want them to be more aware that they're paying those fees if they use an echeque?
Yes, but I don't know of any business that doesn't want to reduce their costs. Do you?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 30-08-2012 12:21 PM
Yes, but I don't know of any business that doesn't want to reduce their costs. Do you?
That's a slight diversion from the issue, though. If you agree that buyers pay those costs (and those costs are only incurred if they purchase and pay), then it's not really a cost to the business.
I'm not actually trying to be argumentative, even if it seems like it, just offered a different perspective on the issue.