- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 02-09-2013 08:31 PM
Different strokes I guess, I can appreciate your willingness and salesmanship, but as I said earlier, any attempts to negotiate terms I didn't like or couldn't meet would all depend on the buyer's approach, and they would have to give me a decent indication that they were open to negotiation and weren't impatienent about the negotiation process.
Hopping off the wheel. ![]()
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 02-09-2013 09:26 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-09-2013 09:44 PM - edited 02-09-2013 09:46 PM
If "in jokes" are your thing then knock yourself out posting meaningless comments in response to mine Davewil, no skin off my nose.
It does not change that sellers should read the conditions a buyer proposes before they accept an offer, IMO it is akin to a buyer not reading the terms and conditions outlined in a listing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 02-09-2013 10:50 PM
I have a few items that have auto accept or reject for specific $$.
That would conform with your demand for 24 hour acceptance, but I would not be honouring a low offer that excluded postage. Where do I sit? My minimum, as d*g pointed out, is exclusive of postage. If the 'buyer' offers my minimum acceptable, but states that should be inclusive of postage (which is not acceptable), where do I stand? My settings would presumably auto accept the offer.
But I would not be prepared to sell. Who is at fault? Not me, regardless of your prejudices. eBay? They won't compensate. Me? I won't post unless I get postage.
So buyers' offers with conditions would seem to be worth what most seller's would consider them to be.
Regardless of your selective quotes.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 03-09-2013 10:40 AM
I just submitted a Best Offer on sumfin and it specifically told me that my offer was for the item only.
So by Civil Law standards i'e it tells you what you CAN do, that means that any reference to include postage costs etc as a condition isn't gonna fly.
An Australian seller's terms and conditions don't trump eBay's policies or ACL.
The wording on timeframe is less specific though - it does say "you "should" allow up to 48 hours for response.... the term "should" is subjective and is not obligatory, so I can't see a problem with including that and eBay obviously agrees as they allow you to withdraw an offer, as does the law - ie - an offer can be withdrawn at any time before acceptance.
Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 03-09-2013 08:05 PM
If I had a buyer putting a 24 hour time limit on their offer I would wait for 25 hours and then accept their offer.
I just like being difficult with smart alec buyers.
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 03-09-2013 09:09 PM
Dificult sellers are simply the worst kind to deal with ebay.
Fortuntely most sellers are very professional and don't adopt a difficult, highly personalised and judgemental attitude when it comes to giving consideration to offers when making a sale.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 03-09-2013 09:49 PM
@thecatspjs wrote:No ifs or buts for me. I am sure it is not.
Otherwise I would not make such offers.
No ifs or buts for me. It is a case of the buyer rewriting ebay policy to suit themselves.