It was an innercity suburb of Perth and definitely within the guidelines on the express page for next day. It has been over a month anyway but something to consider for the future...

---

@11coffees wrote:

 I called AP and they told me that because it is a WA parcel that express post doesn't apply and it would never have been scanned anyway (???).

 

 

---

Good heavens... They may as well have just said "we consider the services we sell to you both optional and ultimately pointless to provide".  😞

 

 

(Just to note, I do understand that express isn't overnight in a lot of cases, but the tracking obviously have nothing to do with how fast a parcel gets somewhere - it isn't part of the express service, it's part of the postage service). 

One thing I do,is take a photo of my parcel, to make sure I have sent it too the right address, as over the years I have made a couple of boo boos.Double check now. and some other sellers i have read on here,do in the post office after the parcel is date stamped, if using normal stamps which I do, as most od mine are letter rate, so no tracking.
so you can double check that you have the right address. That way you can send the customer a photo that you sent it. Just a little hint.

I do that with all of my large letters, but not as protection against addressing errors. I do mine because photographs of postmarked large letters are an acceptable defence against INR claims through Paypal, although it's not so much lost mail that concerns me, but false claims by buyers who think they can get away with it because there's no tracking. What a shock they get when Paypal tells them to bugger off because proof of delivery has been provided. 🙂

---

@digital*ghost wrote:

(Just to note, I do understand that express isn't overnight in a lot of cases, but the tracking obviously have nothing to do with how fast a parcel gets somewhere - it isn't part of the express service, it's part of the postage service). 

---

D*G, if the Express Post item is both sent from, and addressed to postcodes which are published either on the back of the express post envelope or satchel, or on the AP web site, then it most certainly is a guaranteed overnight service. However, if one or both of the of the parties don't reside within the published Express Post network, then it is clearly no longer an overnight service, and is only guaranteed to go via air where possible or available. Additionally, delivery is prioritised where possible.

---

@cq_tech wrote:

---

@digital*ghost wrote:

(Just to note, I do understand that express isn't overnight in a lot of cases, but the tracking obviously have nothing to do with how fast a parcel gets somewhere - it isn't part of the express service, it's part of the postage service). 

---

D*G, if the Express Post item is both sent from, and addressed to postcodes which are published either on the back of the express post envelope or satchel, or on the AP web site, then it most certainly is a guaranteed overnight service. However, if one or both of the of the parties don't reside within the published Express Post network, then it is clearly no longer an overnight service, and is only guaranteed to go via air where possible or available. Additionally, delivery is prioritised where possible.

---

I know 😛 I was just making the point that tracking is (or, at the very least, should be) independent of whether the package is travelling within / between express zones. 

 

In other words, an express package that has a tracking number should be tracked regardless of whether the package is going to arrive overnight, because the tracking isn't contingent on the package qualifying for the standard express service, it is simply part of the postage service. 

OK, I understand now what you were getting at and I absolutely agree. If AP do their job properly, an express post item which has been posted in a yellow street box should be scanned immediately upon arrival at the DC, then again at the destination end, and finally when it is put on board with the driver for delivery. That's a minimum of at least three scanning events so I'm at a complete loss to explain why the OP's parcel had no events recorded at all.

Even if it had been inadvertantly posted in a red street box, it should still have been scanned upon arrival at the DC, so either somebody didn't do their job properly, or some dishonest employee has removed it from the system prior to its first scanning event.

---

@babylonfuture wrote:

Hi,

 

No one else seems to have mentioned it - but have you lodged a claim/complaint about the parcel not showing up? So Australia Post can investigate it.

 

You should be able to at a minimum get the cost of the bag refunded (or another bag sent to you).

---

That might be a bit difficult given that it was posted in a street box and never scanned. AP will therefore have no record of its ever having been posted, so even if the OP has kept the peel-off tracking number, AP has nothing with which to match it.