FactCheck Tony Abbott is wrong on immunisation rates

Another public service announcement.

 

Should we call it a lie?

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-21/tony-abbott-wrong-on-vaccination-rates/4899740

Photobucket

You could but I don't think it was a lie, more not checking and making sure it was the Gospel Truth.

If it was Rudd who made the mistake, it would be called a lie.  And they still call the "no CO2 tax" staement by JG a lie, even when given the whole quote, over and over.  Sadly it works in convincing the braindead to vote LNP even if it means most will be considerably worse off as a result.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .

A lie?  I'm not really sure.  Wasn't he referring to this? http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/pubs/forms/acir.jsp

Did he misrepresent those stats?

 

 

DY: "Should we call it a lie?"

 

Only if you wish to overlook tort law DY,  and add yet again to Cassidy's comment on Insiders, "nothing but trivia"

 

Myopic Tongues2 Small.jpg

Thanks for your permission to call it a lie Monman 🙂

Photobucket

its an exaggeration of the facts . which if said to deliberately to deceive is by definition a Lie.

View solution in original post

I don't know, maybe Monman could check, he probably has more time for detail than I do.

 

There are FactChecks criticizing things that Labor has said, should I start a thread about it just to show my balanced viewpoint? Smiley Wink

Photobucket

Frankly, I'm shocked that tony rabbit and his frenetic followers here even believe in immunology. After all, it's invisible.
.


@donnashuggy wrote:

I don't know, maybe Monman could check, he probably has more time for detail than I do.

 


Ha!  That's exactly what I was just thinking.  I was hoping John would be able to come up with the data analysis because I am not even going to attempt to interpret it.