- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:07 PM
@catmad*2013 wrote:Why was Greenland called Greenland when it is covered in snow... and now that it is going green again and the people can start to grow their own food and not have to import it all how is that a bad thing?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Over the past 30 years the ice cap melting has increased by about 30%.
if the ice caps completely melt the ocean levels may rise enough to flood major cities
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:15 PM
@**meep** wrote:Here, Iza, fixed that for you:
"The argument [behind climate change] is absolute xxxx. However, the politics of this are tough for us. Eighty per cent of people believe climate change is a real and present danger."
His 'context' was summed up quite well by Kerry O'Brien he questioned Abbott on this sentence on the 7.30 report:
In other words, the only conclusion you draw from that is that you are saying, "We have to have a climate change policy because the people believe it's a danger, but I believe it's **bleep**".
Abbott then went on dig a further hole for himself by suggesting that he only said it was **bleep** because of the audience demographics.
To which Kerry O'Brien incredulously asked: So when you say a bit of rhetorical hyperbole in that conversation with that audience you say you adjust the message to whatever audience you are playing to, if that's the case, how do we know you haven't adjusted your message for this audience?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:15 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:16 PM
@catmad*2013 wrote:Why was Greenland called Greenland when it is covered in snow... and now that it is going green again and the people can start to grow their own food and not have to import it all how is that a bad thing?
O.M.G...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:24 PM
@izabsmiling wrote:
@catmad*2013 wrote:Why was Greenland called Greenland when it is covered in snow... and now that it is going green again and the people can start to grow their own food and not have to import it all how is that a bad thing?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Over the past 30 years the ice cap melting has increased by about 30%.
So the Titanic really was ahead of its' time, eh?
Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:27 PM
@catmad*2013 wrote:Why was Greenland called Greenland when it is covered in snow... and now that it is going green again and the people can start to grow their own food and not have to import it all how is that a bad thing?
Priceless.You should have run for office catmad.You'd make a worthy addition to Tony's front bench.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:42 PM
@the*f*word wrote:
@izabsmiling wrote:
@catmad*2013 wrote:Why was Greenland called Greenland when it is covered in snow... and now that it is going green again and the people can start to grow their own food and not have to import it all how is that a bad thing?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Over the past 30 years the ice cap melting has increased by about 30%.
So the Titanic really was ahead of its' time, eh?
only if one ignores the significant scientific details ...those being the 30% increase in ice cap melting over the past 30 years.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 05:59 PM
I think that the Titanic would have been very happy if there was no ice cap.
Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 18-09-2013 06:05 PM
i find it hard io believe that greenland could ever grow all its own food
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
18-09-2013 06:19 PM - edited 18-09-2013 06:21 PM
@the*f*word wrote:I think that the Titanic would have been very happy if there was no ice cap.
No ice caps = 7m rise in ocean levels
and
New York flooded