---

@catmad*2013 wrote:

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

EM I believe Bayden-Clay through his counsel has asked for the information sort to be released to the Court. So he's obviously confident it is favourable to his case.In this particular case, I can't see why it wouldn't be released in view of the facts, that being, one of the parties is deceased, and the other is accused of murder.

 

Are preists bound to release information from confessional admissions?

---

If it is his private counseling information that he wants released I would worry that he had long planned this and actually gone to the therapist with an agenda in mind... 

 

If he wants his wife's personal counseling to be released he obviously thinks that she was such a hopeless case that he can use it in forming another theory. 

 

The thing with Relationships Australia is that if there can't be an agreement via their means it often is because one party is being objectionable. This organisation was designed to be an aid for divorce courts in the hope that less families and children would end up going through the horrible experience of a court case. It is not a place that most people will go when they are looking for a personal therapist. 

---

Cat, yes I believe it is private counseling information he has asked to be released, and yes he has demonstrated cunningness throughout this case, so my guess is he believes the contents would be advantageous to his murder case.