you know, i don't think it was deliberate.  i think it was just the angle.  i took this a couple of minutes ago, did not later it excpept making it brighter because it turned out too dark.

Unlike the photo you posted, which was obviously deliberately altered.

you lot discussin' transformations, 'ere's a narticle, on abbrot's transformation

http://theaimn.com/2013/10/11/transforming-tony-abbott-2/

notable comments underneath the story 

*later = alter

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

---

@catmad*2013 wrote:

Who trusts this man... seriously... he was behind the knocking off of Rudd... then the knocking off of Gillard and then he claims the leadership himself. 

 

 

---

if he isn't up to the job for the reasons murdoch tells you, why bother with the morphed doctored photo ? picked up some pointers from picklering have you ?

---

baby head & waddle walk

  with a face like dumbo's i doubt you lot are in a position to hurl insults based on appearance , especially given he's such a stilted wooden simian walker to boot

---

@lightningdance wrote:

Putting lipstick on a pig is still a pig. Labor are delusional as usual, sticking to the same failed policies that saw them consigned to the political wilderness.

 

Shorten is a pathetic union leader who has no charm or grace, the people will soon see that nothing has changed no matter how much fantasising rhetoric & myth making they go on & on & on & on with.

---

 putting lipstick on an Ape hasn't made a lot of difference either. you lot really fear shorten eh ? its shows in the way the character assaination (attempts at least) began when he first entered parliament. Andrew and Piers are scared to death of him thats obvious.

stilted wooden simian walker 

LOL...good one

i cant spell assassination though