Chuk , imo Scotland Yard are ignoring the important bits for some reason.

They seem to making up timelines and disregarding the one's that the so named tapas 9 have made and signed.

If they are different...there would seem to be some sort disregard to the Justice System by all concerned...not imo a great way to help this child..then or now.

If that efit was made some time ago ....why was it not broadcaste ? why the delay ? 

Why were changes made to original statements made ...within  the first weeks of this child going missing ?

Why is that not suspect ?

Why isn't all of that being told to the world...along with the theory we are being fed ?

Their Lawyer used one case to descredit the possibility that she may be deceased based on the sniffer dogs findings.

that one case the Judge did not feel that it was enough for a murder conviction (it can be though )...does that mean that findings of Keela and Eddie are totally worthless ? Why would it only be the 'murder charge' aspect that are/or others should consider ?

If this child isn't alive.....other children should be focused on.

the words Gerry said about the best thing that came out of court (2010) ...being that there is no evidence .

It seems as though he only looks at it from their side .