- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-01-2014 02:18 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:So why are we so far in debt? Something like 3.5 Billion AUD?
What, in your opinion would be a managable level of debt?
That's a hard question for me, She-el, seeing I'm a political numpty and and not very good at figures either, as you've probably noticed.
But as an answer I'd say...maybe something like the 96-odd billion the Howard government started off with when it took office.
Which was paid down by selling off assets like Telstra and quite a few others, bringing us into a $20bill surplus.
Which is now gone, and not only gone, but now wer'e now evenin more debt, and I don't entirely blame the Labor government, there were circumstances beyond their control.
It does worry me however when a government applies to raise our debt ceiling to $500bill and the opposition says no no no you can only have 400bill, that we still need to borrow more. No there's no debt ceiling at all, to my understanding.
I mean, how are we going to pay even just the interest on those loans? Cutting services, raising taxes and selling off assets seems the logical answer, doesn't it? I mean, if that's going to happen, then why not in the first place, to keep us out of debt and out of foreign hands.?
Which is why I feel a bit insecure when I hear little hints of further Government services to be
privatisedsold off. How much longer before we run out of assets and resources?
BBL
But the problem is, reducing debt by selling assets can only ever be a very short term solution and one that can only lead to increasing problems in the future. - revenue from these assets is lost and the time inevitably comes when there are no more assets to sell. And where do you go from there?
But that's my whole point!