- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:19 PM
@just*duff wrote:well, same. but you really think its worth a 12 month stay, I dont.
🙂
I don't think a prison sentence is appropriate either, just pay for the removal and maybe a little community service.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:25 PM
Hah!
i'd see red
better the justice system hand out the punishment
eliminates any thoughts of taking the law into your own hands, i know i'd want revenge...bad!
Signatures suck.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:25 PM
I saw an awful pic of a tattoo by a guy who worked from his kitchen in the news the other day. The woman wanted an Alice in wonderland type tattoo over her whole back. He did the outline all over her back and it wasn't a clear line it had dots all along it,like when you hold an ink pen down too long. He had done one coloured bit and it was all smudgey.
It was in the UK I think..the lady paid £100 for it, but would cost about £3000 to get it removed. She took the guy to court.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:28 PM
had to google Eric Abetz LL! haha
pay for removal, but jail? even for a month/
Maybe disdabled guy should get new friends?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
17-02-2014 06:31 PM - edited 17-02-2014 06:32 PM
I saw that Am. but that was different- they asked and were paying for their tattoo?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:35 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
17-02-2014 06:36 PM - edited 17-02-2014 06:37 PM
Here is a bit more about the guy in the op from Queensland Times
The court heard at the time of the offence Lord was on bail for armed robbery, which he was sentenced for after this offence took place.
A reference was tendered to the court on behalf of a Gold Coast church where Lord works.
Judge Greg Koppenol described the tattoo as "appalling" and said Lord and Brady had taken advantage of a vulnerable man. "It was a miserable offence," Judge Koppenol said. "You acted miserably towards a vulnerable young man with a significant disability."
Lord was sentenced to 12 months prison, with a parole release date on March 12.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:39 PM
@am*3 wrote:
Yes it is different circumstances. Both left with a tattoo that need removing.
Here is a bit more about the guy in the op from Queensland Times
The court heard at the time of the offence Lord was on bail for armed robbery, which he was sentenced for after this offence took place.
A reference was tendered to the court on behalf of a Gold Coast church where Lord works.
Judge Greg Koppenol described the tattoo as "appalling" and said Lord and Brady had taken advantage of a vulnerable man. "It was a miserable offence," Judge Koppenol said. "You acted miserably towards a vulnerable young man with a significant disability."
Lord was sentenced to 12 months prison, with a parole release date on March 12.
well at least he can work on his tattooing skills while incarcerated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:41 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 17-02-2014 06:44 PM
ha!
thats true,