on โ17-02-2014 05:18 PM
on โ17-02-2014 06:19 PM
@just*duff wrote:well, same. but you really think its worth a 12 month stay, I dont.
๐
I don't think a prison sentence is appropriate either, just pay for the removal and maybe a little community service.
on โ17-02-2014 06:25 PM
Hah!
i'd see red
better the justice system hand out the punishment
eliminates any thoughts of taking the law into your own hands, i know i'd want revenge...bad!
on โ17-02-2014 06:25 PM
on โ17-02-2014 06:28 PM
had to google Eric Abetz LL! haha
pay for removal, but jail? even for a month/
Maybe disdabled guy should get new friends?
โ17-02-2014 06:31 PM - edited โ17-02-2014 06:32 PM
I saw that Am. but that was different- they asked and were paying for their tattoo?
on โ17-02-2014 06:35 PM
โ17-02-2014 06:36 PM - edited โ17-02-2014 06:37 PM
on โ17-02-2014 06:39 PM
@am*3 wrote:
Yes it is different circumstances. Both left with a tattoo that need removing.
Here is a bit more about the guy in the op from Queensland Times
The court heard at the time of the offence Lord was on bail for armed robbery, which he was sentenced for after this offence took place.
A reference was tendered to the court on behalf of a Gold Coast church where Lord works.
Judge Greg Koppenol described the tattoo as "appalling" and said Lord and Brady had taken advantage of a vulnerable man. "It was a miserable offence," Judge Koppenol said. "You acted miserably towards a vulnerable young man with a significant disability."
Lord was sentenced to 12 months prison, with a parole release date on March 12.
well at least he can work on his tattooing skills while incarcerated.
on โ17-02-2014 06:41 PM
on โ17-02-2014 06:44 PM
ha!
thats true,