The circumstances were very different TGSE.  As I understand it, she was picked up driving and her public persona made her easily identifiable.  In his case, the vehicle was not 'linked' with his name nor was the address in Subi. The officers who attended the location would not necessarily have had any idea who the driver of the vehicle was because of those circumstances.

I suggest it only became more publicly known when the complainant neighbour (who obviously knew the ID of the driver) contacted Channel 7.  That suggests an ulterior motive imo.

I cannot speculate as to why the Department of Administrative Services did not release the information to the public but have to ask - why would they?  Is there a requirement or an obligation for them to do so?  I really do not know.

Make no mistake, I do not condone drink driving but wonder about the circumstances and motivation of all parties in this matter.