replying to sheheffalump:....

 

paintsew007 wrote:

As has already been mentioned in this discussion - the plane/debris is nowhere to be seen. The black box emits a signal for 30 days - yet (conveniently) is mentioned in this discussion that last time this type of similar event occurred the black box was faulty.

 

Laser.

Maser.

Laser Radar.

Thermo Nucleic Devices.

Laser Microwave.

Satellite Weapons............

 

 

A vaporized plane would probably not leave an intact black box behind - nor any debris.

---

Then sheheffalump asks monman(John) for his eggspurt opinion, asking, in ref to my original statments:"Question for Monman: John, would any of the above mentioned weapons be capable of 'vaporising' a plane to the extent that there was no debris left? Also could it be done without causing a massive energy burst that would be either seen heard or detected on radar over a wide area?".

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John baby answers unscientifically saying that NOTHING would pick up heat sources or plumes or light from an explosion!! *wow.....what an eggspurt .....accuses me of being a conspiracy theorist for the umpteenth time etc etc.

I have never claimed to be an expert......just going on common sense and method of deduction here.

There are only a few reasons as to why the plane has disappeared and the obvious ones are not being openly discussed-rather refuted strongly by throwing derision and verbal ridicule my way. .......wow.

 

so,

see my earlier post no. 83: "....

However, there's an "off chance," Weeden says, that a super secret U.S. government satellite orbiting 22,000 miles in space might have grabbed evidence. These satellites are in geosynchronous orbit. As a group, they can observe virtually the entire globe. "We know that their mission is to detect ballistic missile launches via heat," says Weeden, now a technical adviser for Secure World Foundation. "We don't know if they're sensitive enough to track something like a bomb blast, even if that's what happened."

Then there's another unanswerable question: Would the government hesitate to release such an image for fear of revealing the satellite system's ultraclassified capability?"

 

 

.....watch this space : scenario..... in the next day or two 'a' black box will 'resurface' that will be 'faulty'......some sort of unidentified debris will also be shown to the media etc etc. To shut everyone up and console the poor family members and friends.

John baby answers unscientifically saying that NOTHING would pick up heat sources or plumes or light from an explosion!! *wow.....what an eggspurt ..

 

What John actually said was: search radars would not  normally detect a thermal bloom from a massive energy burst, however there are more than enough satellites "up there" designed to detect just that.

 

 

.accuses me of being a conspiracy theorist

 

 

It's not an accusation, Paints, you do believe in conspiracies. You believe there is a conspiracy to hide the truth about this plane crash and you believe there is a conspiracy to hide the truth about 'chemtrails.' 

 

Whether those beliefs are credible or merely chuckleworthy is a matter of opinion.

 

 

again I am being accused of being a believer in 'conspiracy theories'.....and sheheffalump speaks incorrectly for me putting words in my mouth!

....she says"It's not an accusation, Paints, you do believe in conspiracies. You believe there is a conspiracy to hide the truth about this plane crash and you believe there is a conspiracy to hide the truth about 'chemtrails.'

 

Whether those beliefs are credible or merely chuckleworthy is a matter of opinion."

 

I have stated on more than one occasion.....I do not believe in much at all .....I do agree with several opinions to explain many scenarios for many unexplained events. I do get very suspicious of the reasons behind people who post derogatory comments directed personally.....and I do get even more suspicious when personal attacks are carried out en masse in a pack in a very short period ....as if this sort of attack will shut me down/shut me up?

Makes me think that there may be some credence to my suggestions to date on this missing plane event.

Have I committed a crime?.....AAAAaaah! You are trying to make me 'feel' like I have perhaps?

.....watch this space : scenario..... in the next day or two 'a' black box will 'resurface' that will be 'faulty'......some sort of unidentified debris will also be shown to the media etc etc. To shut everyone up and console the poor family members and friends.

 

Or in other words - a conspiracy to deceive the public about what really happened to the plane.

Calling anyone sheheffalump is not exactly complimentary..

P007 .. You were the first one to start any personal comments in this thread.. Remember when you jumped on a post of mine and declared it had some other meaning it did not have?.


Most if not all others are respectful of the serious nature of this thread and post their thoughts about the planes disappearance.

 P007 appears to have escaped from some kindergarten.  Pathetic really.

Well if you want a  conspiracy theory, maybe this is where it ended up:

 

http://www.news.net/article/993053?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=outbrainamplify

 

After all, what use is a brand new multi million dollar airport if you don't have your very own airline to go with it?

I hope there are some answers soon. I cannot imagine the anguish the families are going through.

---

@ca04 wrote:

Water inhibits radio  so yes it could prevent the signal.

It may be plausible to listen at water level with an underwater

aerial but then it is not sonics.

The last plane that disapeared like this but a piece of tail was

found and it was in deeper water took 3 years to find the actual plane.

The reported sightings are becoming confusing added to which some

reports of the Airline holding back details of some outo transmitted data

is not helping.

---

Which plane was that?

It's very confusing, you'd expect something from the pilots to indicate a problem,  although I did see today someone saying the pilot had a history of inviting passengers into the cockpit? For no information from the blackbox, and dropping off the radar that quickly with no wreckage, very odd.

The Air France plane?

Quote:
In the case of the Air France plane, it was five days of intensive searching before the first floating wreckage was found. It took nearly two years to locate the remains of the aircraft on the ocean floor 12,000 feet below, broken into thousands of pieces by the impact with the water.
Location of the wreckage may be aided by underwater locator beacons on the airplane's flight recorders, if they have not been damaged in the impact like those on the French plane were.