@i-need-a-martini wrote:
I doubt if terrorist groups would care if a willing member is disabled or not.
So not sure why people are questioning his ability to recieve the pension. The issue of his disability pension (which from articles doesn't make clear if it was accessed but does make clear it was stopped in a timely manner) is separate from the issue of terrorist activities.
I can't imagine what would fill the pages of Murdoch newspapers if a handful of islamic bad eggs weren't around to keep their 'journalists' in a job.
By all means report on the seriousness of any Australian involved in terrorist activities. All of us need to know about this. But why devalue that information with silly information about pensions?
why are we paying a pension to a conviced terrorist?
they had australian targets.......meaning wanted to kill Australians.......he should be getting nothing
