Yeah, and I just know you're frantically trying to find another post that pic could belong to right now.

---

@am*3 wrote:

---

This graphic is totally uncalled for in response to a comment that could in no way be construed as "trolling".

---

@Anonymous wrote:

icy said doodles ...

 

 

 

snicker !

---

and got away with it...

*giggle*

I am not morally outraged...................... rarely see the show,(I have seen a few doodles in my time) my comments are based on the outpourings of reactions in the media over this incident and Newman's response to the criticism............

He removed his underpants.................... why?

People don't watch the footy show to see his genitalia, do they?

---

@nevynreally wrote:

---

 Number 96 and The Box showed just about everything, 40 years ago.

Being morally outraged about a show no one forces you to watch is just pathetic.

---

It is not about showing everything.  One thing when it is in a context of a story.  Totally different when it is a pathetic man flashing his bits for no reason at all.  Maybe he felt nobody is taking about him anymore.   If he did it on the street he would be arrested.   If it was done deliberately, it just show how pathetic he is.

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Those who don't get any usually resort to talking about it a lot, or in this case, indulging in childish exposure games. (Reminds me of someone here).

---

Who?

  Someone who hides a bit.

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

  Someone who hides a bit.

---

hides a bit of what?