If you are struggling to comprehend my post may I suggest you do your research before making an erroneous comment.

lol icyfroth,  a bit like responding to posts that dont concern her and making assumptions. A trait perhaps? Smiley LOL

Hello, everyone. This discussion is getting a little heated. Could we please communicate with a more civil tone. Thanks!

Icy you got the title a lot wrong ( unless you ARE a Bill Shorten fan?) i choose not to read the blurb written in the Herald or wherever your link goes to.

I think it was a clever play on words. icyfroth Woman Happy I dont see the need for pedantic perseverance but hey, Robot wink some feel the need whilst others just see the funny side and move on.Woman Happy


@lightningdance wrote:

If you are struggling to comprehend my post may I suggest you do your research before making an erroneous comment.


Which erroneous comment?

 

Conroy is still a Senator and Carr is not, nothing erroneous there, is there.

Bill For PMWoman Happy

 

Bill.jpg

Oh oh... another petard? and still not  correct...lol soooooo funny


@lightningdance wrote:

Oh oh... another petard? and still not  correct...lol soooooo funny


So what is it then?  Instead of laughing about the error how about clarifying what is wrong with the statemenht that Carr is not and Conroy is still a Senator. 

 

Perhaps you would be so kind as to explain what is another petard as well.


@lightningdance wrote:

lol icyfroth,  a bit like responding to posts that dont concern her and making assumptions. A trait perhaps? Smiley LOL


I think you will find that posters can respond to whoever and whenever they wish, it's a trait of cs. No perhaps about it.