Theres a few here that have replied to my post, so I'll just make a general reply to all (if thats okay)

I will admit, I dont know that much about Sharia law, but I am learning more and more every day.  

I would hate to see an Islamic state take over all of the independent countries in the middle east, that just sounds so extreme and unfair to those countries that are secular or not majority muslim.  But I still think Muslims deserve their own state to live in under Sharia law if they so choose to live there.  I dont know where the ideal spot for this would be (who would've thought Palestine was the ideal spot for a Jewish state? maybe Madagascar would've been a better choice) none the less Isreal is here for the long haul and nothing will ever change that now.  I'm disturbed that IS in Iraq have ethnically cleansed (or are trying to ethnically cleanse) all the non Muslims from the country, but I dont see it as any different to what happened in Palestine in 1948.  And if people could just acknowledge that resistence to occupation is always legitimate then maybe these so called terrorist groups, or support for them, would seem better justified.  

Thanks to Julia for posting those links, very interesting reading, although upon googling some of the terminology from their site ie: da'wah, Ummah, Dar al Kufr I am gaining a better understanding of what this organisation is about, they do seem to have world domination in their ideology, which kinda bothers me so to answer Neros question again, No I dont think I support Hizb ut Tahrir, doesn't mean I think they dont have the right to exist as an organization though.