@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
Remains answerable for corruption charges brought against her which are so mired in inconsistencies nobody either can, or has the stamina to penetrate.
I think the subtleties of the English Language have eluded you again. An accusation' which can be made by anyone on the flimsiest of evidence - or no evidence at all - is not the same as a charge, which has to be brought by proper authorities and answered to in a Court Of Law. when Julia Gillard appeared before the Royal Commission, she was answering questions - not pleading to charges. No charges of any kind have ever been brought against Julia Gillard.
Get outta here with your "subtleties of the english effing language", she-el!
She was using the "subtleties of the English Language" to evade the questions the Royal Commission was putting to her.
I think wer'e pretty familiar with the "subtleties of the English Language" thank you.
