- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 07:49 PM
The big difference between you and me is I don't want to destroy your freedom of choice but you are bent on destroying mine
That is the big issue with lots of antis, they want to restrict you but don't like vice versa.
Re gun laws, if you make them too onerous, eventually people will ignore them totally an djust go illegal
and F/A the Gov't can do about it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:07 PM
I am sorry for your loss Hawk.
Had you read on further before replying....................... I have agreed that they may have found another way........... my other younger cousin also found a rope.
The thing is, I have aunts, nieces and nephews and cousins who found them.............some as young as 5 yo. That's the trauma I was talking about.
I know what I am talking about, just as you do.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:09 PM
The United States has more guns and gun deaths than any other developed country in the world, researchers found.
A study by two New York City cardiologists found that the U.S. has 88 guns per 100 people and 10 gun-related deaths per 100,000 people - more than any of the other 27 developed countries they studied.
Japan, on the other hand, had only .6 guns per 100 people and .06 gun-related deaths per 100,000 people, making it the country with both the fewest guns per capita and the fewest gun-related deaths.
Drs. Sripal Bangalore, who works at NYU Langone Medical Center, and Dr. Franz Messerli of St. Luke's Medical Center studied the statistics of guns per capita and gun deaths. They used firearm injury data from the World Health Organization
and guns per capita data from the Small Arms Survey
to put together a list of 27 developed countries.
They said they carried out their study because of what they said are seemingly baseless claims on either side of the gun control debate.
"I think we need more of what I would call evidence-based discussion and not merely people pulling things out of their hats," Bangalore said. "We hear time and time again about these shootings, especially in the last year or so. A lot of claims are made…so we wanted to look at the data and see if any of this holds water."
They concluded that more guns do not make people safer.
David Hemenway, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health who specializes in injury research and is considered one of the top gun violence researchers in the country, said the there's "no question" that the relationship between guns and gun deaths is real.
"It shouldn't be really a surprise to people," Hemenway said.
There are some caveats to the data, such as countries' records of illegal guns, but it seems to be "reasonable" and on par with previous research, Hemenway said.
The National Rifle Association did not immediately respond to ABCNews.com request for comment.
Here's the full list:Country Guns per 100 Total Firearm-related Deaths per 100,000 United States 88.8 10.2 Switzerland 45.7 3.84 Finland 45.3 3.64 Sweden 31.6 1.47 Norway 31.3 1.78 France 31.2 3 Canada 30.8 2.44 Austria 30.4 2.94 Iceland 30.3 1.25 Germany 30.3 1.1 New Zealand 22.6 2.66 Greece 22.5 1.5 Belgium 17.2 2.43 Luxembourg 15.3 1.81 Australia 15 1.04 South Africa 12.7 9.41 Turkey 12.5 0.72 Denmark 12 1.45 Malta 11.9 2.16 Italy 11.9 1.28 Spain 10.4 0.63 Ireland 8.6 1.03 Portugal 8.5 1.77 Israel 7.3 1.86 United Kingdom 6.2 0.25 Netherlands 3.9 0.46 Japan 0.6 0.06
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:19 PM
aps, I am in agreement with you regarding the shambles the gun laws are in.
Here is one scenario that i know of.
A person was a member of a pistol club for 28 years and an office holder for 2 of those years and state champion for 3 years running in one discipline. the person then suffered a badly broken wrist and disposed of their handguns and let the membership lapse.
In the mean time Martin Bryant happened.
After 11 years of working on their wrist they were able to shoot again, so the person rejoined the same club and applied for a license.
This person had to sit a firearms safely course at a cost of $180. From the time of reapplication to the time that they were allowed to be granted a permit to acquire 14 months went by.
Six of those months, even after having a full handgun license, they were not permitted to own a hand gun for 6 months after the licence was granted.
Now the stupid part emerges.
Under the law the were permitted to borrow a hand gun from a licenced club member for the intervening six month period as advised by the firearms clerk.
Crazy???.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:37 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:40 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:53 PM
No need for anyone to reply but it is worth thinking about.
It someone was pointing a gun at you or your family and you had access to a gun, what would YOU do?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 08:57 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 09:03 PM
I had a retail establishnent and my policy was that if someone demanded the money i would smile and ask if they wanted a laptop as well:)
All covered by insurance so why risk getting injured?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 07-12-2014 09:09 PM