---

@nevynreally wrote:

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Abbott is reminding them of the help provided by Australia

 

That can be an insult

---

You want to live free, don't take from others. Then you can say and or do whatever you want.

---

Take?

---

@nevynreally wrote:

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Abbott is reminding them of the help provided by Australia

 

That can be an insult

---

You want to live free, don't take from others. Then you can say and or do whatever you want.

---

The thing is, they (Indonesia and other countries) don't have the capacity or the structure to do some

things without our or the US's help.

can't find episode 3

There is only two so far?

Indonesia a developing country.

During 2013-14, thanks to Australian aid in Indonesia:

• More than 97,000 births were attended by skilled birth attendants
• 1,734 classrooms were built or upgraded and more than 234,000 students were provided with financial or nutritional supports
• 296 kilometers of roads were constructed, rehabilitated or maintained and more than 2.8 million poor women and men received access to social transfers such as cash or food
• More than 494,000 people were provided with increased access to safe water and more than 69,000 with increased access to basic sanitation

DFAT

It was good to read that Abbott was black and white when he came out about "the benefit of the doubt"

had swung too much the wrong way.

I think the link between people who are radical and welfare needs to be looked at and welfare cut off first and not last

and then the person being radical has to prove why they deserve welfare if they spend all their time being radical.

The same applies to violent protestors.

'

No one whose income exceeds $100,000 per year needs any social security support.

People claim "Oh, but i have a $500,000 dollar mortgage and four kids to put through (private) school. Suck it up. . . those are your life choices and the public purse shouldn't be called upon to subsidise them.

Welfare payments to the middle-class, high-income earning leaners on our collective tax dollar has to be stopped.

Give welfare where it is due and where it is needed. Don't give even one cent to the Monmans of our world who are wealthy enough to support themselves but who still, selfishly lean on the rest of us to kick in to help pay for their caviar, champagne and their smoked salmon.

Care to back up what you say ?

Where does the public purse subsidise them ?

Where does this "Welfare payments to the middle-class, high-income earning leaners on our collective tax dollar

has to be stopped" occur ?

Give specific examples please.

Especially for this

"selfishly lean on the rest of us to kick in to help pay for their caviar, champagne and their smoked salmon."

(And Gina Rhinehart doesn't count, that's company, not personal).