on 25-01-2015 04:38 PM
A reminder of the debt that Australia has, while Labor can bury their heads and deny it exists the fact remains we have a huge problem with debt and sooner than later the chips will fall, no business, no state and no country can keep operating in the red, eventually those we own the money to will own us. Who will own us?
The state of Qld has debt of $80 billion dollars, Labor are saying they don’t think it’s that bad, Bill Shorten on Australia’s debt, there is no debt crisis, there is a crisis and we are in this situation because of Labor, no one else and the bottom line is Labor can’t fix this problem, their speciality is creating debt not fixing debt.

Solved! Go to Solution.
on 22-02-2015 10:16 PM
@nevynreally wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:Abbott is reminding them of the help provided by Australia
That can be an insult
You want to live free, don't take from others. Then you can say and or do whatever you want.
Take?
on 22-02-2015 10:25 PM
@nevynreally wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:Abbott is reminding them of the help provided by Australia
That can be an insult
You want to live free, don't take from others. Then you can say and or do whatever you want.
The thing is, they (Indonesia and other countries) don't have the capacity or the structure to do some
things without our or the US's help.
on 22-02-2015 11:17 PM
on 22-02-2015 11:19 PM
on 22-02-2015 11:37 PM
![]()
on 22-02-2015 11:39 PM
can't find episode 3
on 22-02-2015 11:45 PM
There is only two so far?
Indonesia a developing country.
During 2013-14, thanks to Australian aid in Indonesia:
DFAT
on 23-02-2015 01:38 AM
It was good to read that Abbott was black and white when he came out about "the benefit of the doubt"
had swung too much the wrong way.
I think the link between people who are radical and welfare needs to be looked at and welfare cut off first and not last
and then the person being radical has to prove why they deserve welfare if they spend all their time being radical.
The same applies to violent protestors.
'
23-02-2015 02:13 AM - edited 23-02-2015 02:15 AM
No one whose income exceeds $100,000 per year needs any social security support.
People claim "Oh, but i have a $500,000 dollar mortgage and four kids to put through (private) school. Suck it up. . . those are your life choices and the public purse shouldn't be called upon to subsidise them.
Welfare payments to the middle-class, high-income earning leaners on our collective tax dollar has to be stopped.
Give welfare where it is due and where it is needed. Don't give even one cent to the Monmans of our world who are wealthy enough to support themselves but who still, selfishly lean on the rest of us to kick in to help pay for their caviar, champagne and their smoked salmon.
23-02-2015 02:18 AM - edited 23-02-2015 02:19 AM
Care to back up what you say ?
Where does the public purse subsidise them ?
Where does this "Welfare payments to the middle-class, high-income earning leaners on our collective tax dollar
has to be stopped" occur ?
Give specific examples please.
Especially for this
"selfishly lean on the rest of us to kick in to help pay for their caviar, champagne and their smoked salmon."
(And Gina Rhinehart doesn't count, that's company, not personal).