---

@azureline** wrote:

Have you met AM3?

her post was clearly from the SMH.

---

I know it was from the SMH, it said so at the bottom.

I had already read the article.

Hey, she set the criteria over how Abbott needed to win, and he did so convincingly.

She just doesn't want to except it was that way.

---

@idlewhile wrote:

LOL....................Don't take any notice of the left's blindness and hatreds, let it be water off a ducks back, don't bite otherwise you may get an unexpected holiday. 

 

btw,  what's a W? 

---

Holidays seem to make no difference.  

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Abbott did NOT win convincingly.   That was the whole point of the spill motion.  Under 20 no votes might be a convincing win.

It now is only a matter of time.

The pundits suggest that Sinnerdinos was the architect.

Do you think it's at all telling that abbott is not holding a press conference about this mornings outcome?  Could it be because he can't be trusted to speak off the cuff?

Let's hope that rather than feel emboldened by the vote Tony um-er-ah Abbott feels chastened.

Yes it's unusual given the circumstances, where is he?

---

@lurker172602 wrote:

Do you think it's at all telling that abbott is not holding a press conference about this mornings outcome?  Could it be because he can't be trusted to speak off the cuff?

---

Do you mean "carefully scripted"? so we know it's the truth?

Recording a statement for channel 9 apparently