on 09-02-2015 09:18 AM
on 09-02-2015 09:43 AM
on 09-02-2015 09:49 AM
@azureline** wrote:
Have you met AM3?
her post was clearly from the SMH.
I know it was from the SMH, it said so at the bottom.
I had already read the article.
Hey, she set the criteria over how Abbott needed to win, and he did so convincingly.
She just doesn't want to except it was that way.
on 09-02-2015 09:54 AM
@idlewhile wrote:LOL....................Don't take any notice of the left's blindness and hatreds, let it be water off a ducks back, don't bite otherwise you may get an unexpected holiday.
btw, what's a W?
Holidays seem to make no difference.
09-02-2015 09:59 AM - edited 09-02-2015 10:01 AM
@polksaladallie wrote:
Abbott did NOT win convincingly. That was the whole point of the spill motion. Under 20 no votes might be a convincing win.
It now is only a matter of time.
The pundits suggest that Sinnerdinos was the architect.
on 09-02-2015 10:01 AM
Watching Sky now and they are salivating, witchunting, doing Labors work, just like what they did to Gillard, vultures.
on 09-02-2015 10:01 AM
Do you think it's at all telling that abbott is not holding a press conference about this mornings outcome? Could it be because he can't be trusted to speak off the cuff?
on 09-02-2015 10:02 AM
Let's hope that rather than feel emboldened by the vote Tony um-er-ah Abbott feels chastened.
on 09-02-2015 10:03 AM
Yes it's unusual given the circumstances, where is he?
on 09-02-2015 10:04 AM
@lurker172602 wrote:Do you think it's at all telling that abbott is not holding a press conference about this mornings outcome? Could it be because he can't be trusted to speak off the cuff?
Do you mean "carefully scripted"? so we know it's the truth?
on 09-02-2015 10:04 AM
Recording a statement for channel 9 apparently