Ouch, this is going to hurt the Palestinians

 

US terrorism verdict heaps $800m in damages on tottering Palestinian Authority

 

Washington: The latest in a series of court cases targeting Palestinian entities that might have thought themselves beyond US law, leaves the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organisation staring down the barrel of a $US655.5 million ($838.7 million) damages judgement.

 

The verdict by a Federal Court jury in New York comes on the heels of a judgement in September 2014 that the Arab Bank knowingly supported terrorism because funds transfers it made amounted to material support for Hamas, a designated terrorist group.  A further hearing, scheduled for May, will fix the bank's penalty, which some legal observers warn could be as much as $US1 billion.

 

 

"And so the Palestinian Authority and the PLO found themselves in the same Welch-Klinghoffer pincers grip as Monday's decision was delivered in New York. The Palestinian leadership was held responsible for six attacks between 2002 and 2004 in which 33 US and Israeli citizens died and 400 more were wounded."

 

 

Hey, Boris, you better get out there rattling the old tin and collect a few coins Smiley LOL

 

 

talking about guns gave me a thought

how does this sound to everyone

 

if the Australian govt had a short term amnesty on I S supporters

 

allow them to leave Australia and return to their country and fight for the cause they believe in

 

on the proviso that they forfeit their Australian Citizenship and are not able to return

 

these people are never going to be happy here and forcing them to stay can only cause trouble .

 

thus giving the Muslim people who legitimately came here for a peaceful life a chance to do so

 

 

 

 

your question to vic implied that he/she

owed us all  an explanation.  i didn't want

vic to think that.   i think we should just leave

it at that.  (getting off topic)

 

 

 

good idea but what about the ones whos mission is to stay here to cause havoc?

 photo walkingdeadtag_zpsbaca2fdd.jpg

Anonymous
Not applicable

interesting..

The trouble with that is that they "might" go to join isis but they really want to return to  a 1st world country. Also there is a lot of support for isis here from the wider community it's just that we don't know about it.

 

" The Religion of Peace" is not and has never been a peaceful religion, its very teachings are violent and backward.

 

Obama can't even mention them by name, they are just ratbags and if they could only just get then jobs everything will be OK. This  man is an enemy of the USA, a terrorist ignorer  and the awareness of this is growing about him every day.


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@idlewhile wrote:

You cant be serious?? are you saying that this terrorism that is SWEEPING THE WORLD is just a joke?? a hoax? what? shame on you you and your ilk.


No, you are the one saying that I am saying that.

Unfortunately meaningless personal invective is never a substitute for rational argument. and only makes those who post it  look foolish and vindictive


The only foolish and vindictive post came from you she el and you know it.

2015 

 

DV deaths   14

 

Terrorism deaths    0

 

We sure have our prorities sorted, don't we?

Anonymous
Not applicable

Tony Abbott announces national domestic violence order scheme on COAG agenda 

 

http://www.news.com.au/national/tony-abbott-announces-national-domestic-violence-order-scheme-on-coa...


@idlewhile wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@idlewhile wrote:

You cant be serious?? are you saying that this terrorism that is SWEEPING THE WORLD is just a joke?? a hoax? what? shame on you you and your ilk.


No, you are the one saying that I am saying that.

Unfortunately meaningless personal invective is never a substitute for rational argument. and only makes those who post it  look foolish and vindictive


The only foolish and vindictive post came from you she el and you know it.



@idlewhile wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@idlewhile wrote:

You cant be serious?? are you saying that this terrorism that is SWEEPING THE WORLD is just a joke?? a hoax? what? shame on you you and your ilk.


No, you are the one saying that I am saying that.

Unfortunately meaningless personal invective is never a substitute for rational argument. and only makes those who post it  look foolish and vindictive


The only foolish and vindictive post came from you she el and you know it.


Which one? tell me the post number.