@vicr3000 wrote:

An observation re the report. Triggs seemed to have included quite a few drawings from children.

I don't see a need to put these in the report. Of course the media jump on them and assign all sorts

of things to them but they don't add to the report in any way.

  

 


They were very relevent to developing conclusions when the children were examined by psychologists.Drawing is one of the most useful tools for garnering information particularly from very young children or those with language difficulties.

 

My daughter (who has a slight intellectual disability) isn't very good with words (either written or verbal) and draws as a way of explaining what she means or how she feels. We started asking her to do this from a very young age as it can tell us exactly what is going through her mind.

 

In regards to adding them to the report, when I saw them it summarised very quickly how these children felt without having to read through their case studies.

 

Oh great, now we make assessments on children based on a "colour crayon childrens drawing" and

lets not worry about reading the report.

 

They didn't need to be in the report as the people reading it aren't qualified to make a judgement based on it and are more than likely, like you, do make a judgement based on them rather than reading the Physch assessment.

 

 

Smiley LOL

I keep coming back to this thread to see if anyone has come up with a solution for the children ............... but, NOPE!

 

rabbit

 

On a scale of 1 to 10, where do you think the care factor of children comes ?

 

Or anyone else for that matter.

 

 

Of the top of my head, I'd put it a being 5 - 7.

 

 

Not my view, how I see them viewed by others in the big picture.

I might try to list 1 - 5 later on.

 

 

 


@i-need-a-martini wrote:

@vicr3000 wrote:

An observation re the report. Triggs seemed to have included quite a few drawings from children.

I don't see a need to put these in the report. Of course the media jump on them and assign all sorts

of things to them but they don't add to the report in any way.


They were very relevent to developing conclusions when the children were examined by psychologists.Drawing is one of the most useful tools for garnering information particularly from very young children or those with language difficulties.

 

My daughter (who has a slight intellectual disability) isn't very good with words (either written or verbal) and draws as a way of explaining what she means or how she feels. We started asking her to do this from a very young age as it can tell us exactly what is going through her mind.

 

In regards to adding them to the report, when I saw them it summarised very quickly how these children felt without having to read through their case studies.


You are so right when you detail how important drawings are.

 

They have been used for decades in paediatric psychiatry and child abuse investigation.  Some children are so traumatised that they have stopped speaking, or they trust nobody and can express their thoughts only in drawings.

 

Added.......Can't believe the ignorance which follows your post.


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

I keep coming back to this thread to see if anyone has come up with a solution for the children ............... but, NOPE!


I came up with a simple solution a while ago if you care to scroll back.

 

But everyone preferred to find excuses so they could continue to flap around in circles.


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

Oh great, now we make assessments on children based on a "colour crayon childrens drawing" and

lets not worry about reading the report.

 

They didn't need to be in the report as the people reading it aren't qualified to make a judgement based on it and are more than likely, like you, do make a judgement based on them rather than reading the Physch assessment.

 

 

Smiley LOL


It may be difficult for you to decipher, but I believe any sensible person with half a brain would be able to see at a glance what they were dealing with when viewing those drawings.

 

You don't have to be an expert to make a call on the nature of those drawings.

 

The report was about CHILDREN. Many of them do not speak English. Many of them are too young to read or write. A drawing is their way of communicating. Do you suggest the drawings are ignored and left out of the report? If sho, how are their case studies to be presented? By a blank page?

 


I need

Care to re post it ?

 

Polks

 

I know that, but are they needed in the AHRC report.

 

The answer is NO, they are not.

 

 


@vicr3000 wrote:

I need

Care to re post it ?

No.

 

It is on page 6.

 

You clicked the 'reply' button on that post twice. Which shows me that you are so fixated on disregarding anything other than your own opinion that you fail to see what is right in front of you.