Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;

---

@poddster wrote:

Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;

---

yes, where could we begin

how about the tobaco industry and the governments whom tax the daylights out of tabaco products

Just goes to illustrate Joz, taxing something to minimise its use does not work.

---

@poddster wrote:

Just goes to illustrate Joz, taxing something to minimise its use does not work.

---

it is just an excuse to reap revenue from the hopelessly addicted smokers, taking advantage of them, imo, they are no better than the hard drug dearers, in fact..worse

Yor are probably right Joz it certainly affects more people

---

@joz*garage wrote:

---

@poddster wrote:

Just goes to illustrate Joz, taxing something to minimise its use does not work.

---

it is just an excuse to reap revenue from the hopelessly addicted smokers, taking advantage of them, imo, they are no better than the hard drug dearers, in fact..worse

 

---

Of course, if we culled all the smokers there'd be no need for a tobacco tax.

---

@poddster wrote:

Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Drug king pins would find more dealers.

 

Only young people are drug addicts?

what is a DS thread may i ask?

Hint - who