on 05-03-2015 06:30 PM
What group would you start with?
on 05-03-2015 11:09 PM
Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;
on 05-03-2015 11:16 PM
@poddster wrote:Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;
yes, where could we begin
how about the tobaco industry and the governments whom tax the daylights out of tabaco products
on 05-03-2015 11:19 PM
Just goes to illustrate Joz, taxing something to minimise its use does not work.
on 05-03-2015 11:24 PM
on 05-03-2015 11:30 PM
Yor are probably right Joz it certainly affects more people
on 05-03-2015 11:34 PM
Is this like a DS thread? if so i’ll bow out now.
on 05-03-2015 11:35 PM
@joz*garage wrote:
@poddster wrote:Just goes to illustrate Joz, taxing something to minimise its use does not work.
it is just an excuse to reap revenue from the hopelessly addicted smokers, taking advantage of them, imo, they are no better than the hard drug dearers, in fact..worse
Of course, if we culled all the smokers there'd be no need for a tobacco tax.
05-03-2015 11:37 PM - edited 05-03-2015 11:39 PM
@poddster wrote:Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Drug king pins would find more dealers.
Only young people are drug addicts?
on 05-03-2015 11:37 PM
what is a DS thread may i ask?
on 05-03-2015 11:38 PM
Hint - who