what did I miss?

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

---

@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

 

---

Yes, it's almost as if a whole day is gone? I particularly liked the post you put up - thankfully I took a copy before it went.

Perhaps someone should ask the mods?

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

---

@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

 

---

Yes, it's almost as if a whole day is gone? I particularly liked the post you put up - thankfully I took a copy before it went.

 

Perhaps someone should ask the mods?

---

Thanks 🙂  I didn't think there was anything offensive about any of those posts.  Interpersonal? Maybe a little. But not in any malicious way I didn't think. 

How can it not be interpersonal when we are talking about individual beliefs? It's annoying how certain posts are seen to be not appropriate yet others stay... It would be nice if the moderators left a bit of an explanation when they cut threads down like that. 

---

@curmu-curmu wrote:

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

---

---

OK. Pick one. Let's take your favourite if you like 'human embryos".

---

I'm good with that. But before any debate takes place, you'll need to research the facts prior. Googling 'human embryo gills' will take you to a myriad of sites - and curiously, the ONLY ones that discount the theory, are the religious sites. A classic example of distorting the facts to suit an agenda.

Anyway, here's just a couple worth looking into...

 

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evodevo_02

 

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/06/14/are-the-gill-slits-of-vertebrate-embryos-a-hoax/

 

and to add balance...

 

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/something-fishy-about-gill-slits/

 

I await your investigations...

---

"Googling 'human embryo gills' will take you to a myriad of sites - and curiously, the ONLY ones that discount favour the theory, are the religious evolutionist sites. A classic example of distorting the facts to suit an agenda.

---

@curmu-curmu wrote:

True! 

And interesting to note that many other animals also bear lanugo - whales, primates, seals and elephants, to name a few. Yet to some, they're not at all related to humans - despite so much contrary evidence.

---

and many other animals have two ears,  a nose and a mouth - are they all related to humans too?

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

---

@curmu-curmu wrote:

True! 

And interesting to note that many other animals also bear lanugo - whales, primates, seals and elephants, to name a few. Yet to some, they're not at all related to humans - despite so much contrary evidence.

---

and many other animals have two ears,  a nose and a mouth - are they all related to humans too?

---

If they are mammals then my understanding is yes, they are.

---

@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolutionary_genetics

Humans,chimps and bonobos share aroumd 98%-99% of DNA.TO see a 100% match please refer to the Reclaim Australia thread

---

how much difference is there between Neanderthal and Homo sapien?

Apparently we share about 97.5 %

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_genome_project

There is also growing evidence that modern humans may have interbred with Neanderthals

http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/science-neanderthal-genes-modern-human-dna-01734....