Their body, their choice. I have seen some that are not spelt correctly which is kind of embarrassing, but thats not really specific to womens tattoos.

---

@watta*drama*queen wrote:

---

@monman12 wrote:

"What sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on women?"        Oh dear !

 

 

Not every time a subject here that  involves women actually represents an "attack" upon them, in fact what sort of inadequacy causes a person to think it's their right to pass judgement on those who wish to debate a topic such as this. One, I might add, that has been mulled over  a few times here, and in CW, during past years.

 

My view is:  why on earth permanently graffiti what is beautiful, a woman's body. There is no point in attempting to guild the Lily, or Jane, or Anne  etc, etc.

 

 

---

What sort of inadequacy causes a person to introduce sexism to derail this thread ?

An inadequacy of their own perhaps .

Sad really 

---

The sexism was introduced in the title.

If not the title would have been Tattoos.  

I'm not scared or savage. I think calling anyone cheap is a degrading judgement which lowers people down a thing with a pricetag. I like my tatts and the ones my family members have. My mum and dad has several really cool ones.

Tattoos are a personal thing, some people like them, some don't, I loathe them, to me they make the peson who has them always look dirty   ... but each to their own    .... 

---

@harley_babes_hoard wrote:

I can't see anything wrong with this

---

typo:- scarred

that looks pathetic, was the heck was she thinking, lol

---

@joz*garage wrote:

women with tatts look like cheap scared savages to me

---

Do men with tatts also look like cheap, scared savages to you, Joz. And did you actually mean scared, scarred or scarey?

i corrected my typo in my last post, she-el

yup, that need for attention, hey... look at me with the tatt...pfft

*think before you ink*