@*julia*2010 wrote:
@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:LOL. Good point. She used inflammatory language to get more clicks on her poorly written article. Shameful. Shock jock journalism. She could learn a thing or two from the link that you posted.
i don't subscribe to the australian
so can't read the entire article.
difficult to make a judgement based on
5 lines....
as Blue has already mentioned it is more than 5 lines and I posted her entire 'terrorist threat" section from the article.. as it is paywalled.
the rest of the article is about their boring award night on the awards they give themselves 
