Maybe there should be a policy that dogs should be muzzled on a lead? 

I see nothing wrong with that, a win win all round.  No risk of bites,  the dogs are comfortable with muzzles for short periods,

everyone is happy.  (well nearly everyone, except those who dislike dogs just for the sake of it, but that's another matter)

I used to be a doggie person.

My atitude has changed.   I am now wary of all dogs.

I don't care if someone says their dog is a perfect angel.

They all have teeth.  And no-one knows what their dog is thinking.

My FIL was savaged to death by a dog that he knew!

He went to visit - rang the bell - they weren't home and

the dog came racing.   Got savaged on one leg.  Main artery bitten

Got himself into the car and bled out. 

If Bunnings adopt this policy in Vic,  I will be going to Masters

Thanks for that link, julia.

I have voted 'no'

god Stawka thats horrible ................

i have 2 big scar's on my cheek from a dog attack when i was 2 years old 

had 3 more attacks during my life (not bitten but near misses)

but i still love dogs most are lovely wish i could say the same for the owners

i voted no also but looks like the yes will win 

why would you need to take a dog in anyway? (unless its a blind dog of coarse)

dumb idea in the first place 

and youd think with the liability laws they would be liable if theres an attack ????????