- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 09:43 PM
Riots in the streets? that’s a bit of an overreaction. If people want to drink, smoke and gamble that’s their choice but remember who’s paying for it and it may very well be the taxpayers who riot in the streets.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 10:09 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
20-01-2016 10:48 PM - edited 20-01-2016 10:51 PM
So how does that work?
remember who is paying for it, well what about people who have worked and paid tax, now all of a sudden find themselves out of a job , and now find themselves dependant on benifits are they not entitled to get some of their tax back that they had paid when they worked?
Fair crack of the whip.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:02 PM
@esayaf wrote:
It's that kind of attitude that fuels the prejudice. It's not your money any more once the government takes it off of you and it's not the government's money after they've given it away
I was following your arguments up until now and agreed with quite a few things you said, but sorry you just lost me on this one.
I dont think there are many workers who would accept that they need to work extra hours for free to provide gambling money, drug money or excessive alchohol for those who either cant or wont work.
The Government has also made it very clear that this is not what welfare payments are designed to be used for. Tax payers, Governments and welfare recipients have all entered a social covenment. This covenant is to provide basic neccesities for those who cant provide for themselves. We can argue about the level of support that should be provided but not the purpose of that support.
The majoriy of welfare recipients use the money given to them for the purposes that it was provided. ( Lets face it, once most pay the rent, utilities and basic food, theres nothing left anyway. )
Your suggestion that it is a welfare recipients right to neglect their kids and gamble welfare payments away, or spend it on ice or dope ( its not taxpayers money or the Governments money after they give it to the welfare recipient ) is the exactly the reason the card idea has been suggested. It is exactly this attitude which is forcing the Government to consider the cards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:42 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:44 PM
Something that neither major party is prepared to give us
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:48 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:49 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 20-01-2016 11:54 PM
@esayaf wrote:
It's that kind of attitude that fuels the prejudice. It's not your money any more once the government takes it off of you and it's not the government's money after they've given it away
Your argument is that once the government gives taxpayers money to welfare rcipients, it is theirs to do with as they please. There are many welfare recipients who choose to spend welfare on gambling, drugs and excessive alcohol consumption, often at the expense of other family members ( often children. ). This is their right according to the above post.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 21-01-2016 06:35 AM
I was beaten by my father every day nearly and he had a job and didn't work.
so I don't endorse violence or neglect. I don't believe my statement is an endorsement of the activities that you have mentioned. My point is that plenty of working people also engage in the activities you mentioned but the government is seemingly only interested in punishing all welfare recipients as is the general public for a community wide problem by stigmatising all welfare recipients.
I'll say again I don't know the answer, it would seem no one does but this card isn't it it is just a blatant vote grab by jumping on the welfare recipient bashing band wagon.
How about you come up with an answer to solve this problem for the whole community rather than twisting my words and making me the bad guy in this debate.
You are just attacking me now not the issue