@not_for_sale2016 wrote:
@sock*it*to*me wrote:
@not_for_sale2016 wrote:
How confusing!
Which sock*it*to*me are you? Didn't think you'd speak to Joe that way!!
tell me about it, i didn't know the OP was Joe
btw, who are you?
Oh ok.
It's just that you replied to Joe, referred to him as "mate" and sounded a fraction like the original sock*it*to*me.
I am not_for_sale2016 - the one and only.
The sock*it*to*me id is actually Joe so don't worry he's just talking to himself 
Oh ok.
It's just that you replied to Joe, referred to him as "mate" and sounded a fraction like the original sock*it*to*me.
I am not_for_sale2016 - the one and only.
The sock*it*to*me id is actually Joe so don't worry he's just talking to himself
Don't think so. Joe's tougher than that, he doesn't need to hide behind someone else's face. He's far too forthright and would find that unbecoming, I believe.
@poison_ivys_pen wrote:you reckon?? he's admitted it in other places that it's his id
Then I've misjudged him. What a shame.
@poison_ivys_pen wrote:
@not_for_sale2016 wrote:
@sock*it*to*me wrote:
@not_for_sale2016 wrote:
How confusing!
Which sock*it*to*me are you? Didn't think you'd speak to Joe that way!!
tell me about it, i didn't know the OP was Joe
btw, who are you?
Oh ok.
It's just that you replied to Joe, referred to him as "mate" and sounded a fraction like the original sock*it*to*me.
I am not_for_sale2016 - the one and only.
The sock*it*to*me id is actually Joe so don't worry he's just talking to himself
was not, i was talking to the op 
