---

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

Actually I think it would be Anne. She's older than Andrew 

---

It would Andrew, then his kids,  then Edward, then his kids then Anne 'cause the change only affects females born AFTER 2011

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

George: son of William & Kate

Andrew - is now far down the track.

Then not Andrews kids then.

He only had girls.....before 2011

---

@domino-710 wrote:

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

 

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

 

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

 

George: son of William & Kate

 

Andrew - is now far down the track.

---

The discussion is about Regency, not succession

I give up.  'It's all too hard'

And I don't really give a rat's................

---

@domino-710 wrote:

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

 

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

 

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

 

George: son of William & Kate

 

Andrew - is now far down the track.

---

The question was who would be regent for Prince George? The line is as I wrote it

No need to be sorry

The ' discussion ' began with Succession - then the question of Regency.

---

@imastawka wrote:

Then not Andrews kids then.

 

He only had girls.....before 2011

---

They are still his kids, so they next line before Edward ............. 

---

@domino-710 wrote:

---

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

It wouldn't make much difference anyway.  he already has Charles, William, George, Charlotte and Louis ahead of him - not to mention any cildren any of them may yet produce. 

---

Just wondering.

 

If say - Charles on the throne - something happens - then comes William - something happens - George - how old - would be King - could Harry be called upon to be regent.

---

Until - this post - the question of Recency - had not come up.

---

@domino-710 wrote:

---

@domino-710 wrote:

---

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

It wouldn't make much difference anyway.  he already has Charles, William, George, Charlotte and Louis ahead of him - not to mention any cildren any of them may yet produce. 

---

Just wondering.

 

If say - Charles on the throne - something happens - then comes William - something happens - George - how old - would be King - could Harry be called upon to be regent.

---

Until - this post - the question of Recency - had not come up.

---

And my answers came AFTER this post 

Lyh - that still does not have any bearing on the line of Succession.

Before after posts - they so far are all living.