As mentioned in an earlier post, I work for the government and am partially paid from tax payer funds. I donate between 2 and 3 thousand a year to an animal charity, because I know that 100% goes to the animals. I know that because I have known the person who runs it for about 40 years. She had to jump through hoops to become a registered charity. I donate money from my tax payer funded pay. It is my right to do that.
I claim that amount every year on my tax and whatever I get back from my tax for my donation, goes straight back to the charity. I've turned it into a revolving door. So in effect, while I'm making a substantial donation (substantial by my standards), it's really the tax payer that is paying for it because I am claiming it each year.
It's no different to the AP CEO. He is free to donate HIS money to whoever he likes. Would it be such a hoo haa if he decided to donate the money to the Catholic church, or the Salvo's?
I think the problem with X3 is, he just hates everything and anything to do with AP and is trying to get everyone else to feel the same way. Even if it means fabricating stories in the process.
