So after 10 years your first contribution is to drag up a 3 year old thread and add no value.

 

I look forward to your next contribution, presumably in 2028, which will hopefully address a thread that has yet to be started.

dimich_01
Community Member

Transparency in feedback is essential to credibility.

 

If a buyer fails to pay on one occasion, and still has 100% positive feedback thereafter - what's the purpose of having feedback at all?

 

Illogical to me

 

As a seller I should have the right to leave negative feedback about the "buyer"


@dimich_01 wrote:

 

As a seller I should have the right to leave negative feedback about the "buyer"

 


Like it or not, that's the way it works - as has been said many times negs for buyers don't work.

 

What DOES work is if you do a non-payer cancellation, if you do that the non-payer gets a strike and if you have your buyer blocks in place then serial non-payers won't be able to buy from you.

______________________________________________________

"Start me up I'll never stop......"


@dimich_01 wrote:

Transparency in feedback is essential to credibility.

 

 

 

It certainly is... in your case it shows what type of seller you are.


 

9 year old thread.

Hi everyone,

Due to the age of this thread, it has been closed to further replies. Please feel free to start a new thread HERE if you wish to continue to discuss this topic.

Thank you for understanding.