---

@j*oono wrote:

 

This thread cracks me up.  Next time someone starts one about favourite ever threads, the Brad email will be right up there.

---

i changed his name to protect his identity. his real name is peter

To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.

---

@electric*mayhem*band wrote:

To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.

 

---

to whom seems very shakespere like

---

@downeyas wrote:

I just wrote AN email - Who does Brad need to talk with to solve the problem

---

Correct.

don't forget the question mark!

---

@*mrgrizz* wrote:

to whom seems very shakespere like

---

Quite so, dear boy.

ahem.   I believe the term to be 'shakespearean'  eh, what?

---

@electric*mayhem*band wrote:

To whom does Brad need to converse with, in order to resolve the problem.

 

---

Isn't the "with" redundant here?  To converse automatically assumes it is with someone else. 

Unless Brad is having this conversation in his head, in which case I quite understand the problem, and advise him to seek  help in whatever form he choses.

---

@*mrgrizz* wrote:

---

@*sparklz* wrote:

i just wrote a an email

 

who does Brad need to talk to too solve the problem

---

still doesn't seem right

---

because it isn't 

too you would use for meaning as well as/also

ie; I would like to come too.I wish to speak with suchabody too .

Quite a few people have trouble with  knowing the difference between too and to .